Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Minor point - 2/3 of the Senate is not required to convict [View all]PJMcK
(22,025 posts)6. You see, that's why we need lawyers
There are always details that the layman will miss.
Thanks for the clarity, sir.
I like the idea that the Senate could hold the impeachment trial and then vote in secret. You know that the majority of the Republicans would vote to convict if they didn't have to own their votes.
As always, you're a voice of clarity... and humor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Mcconnell can say his hands were tied and he had to hold a vote immediately.
Tiggeroshii
Oct 2019
#38
Hold a Trump Appreciation Celebration and when the Republicans flock to it. take the vote.
Midnight Writer
Oct 2019
#22
Yes and how about trying to knock some of them out for prejudging the case. I know it's a stretch..
Pepsidog
Oct 2019
#23
Good question. Not sure if they could be conflicted out for any reason. Beyond my
Pepsidog
Oct 2019
#39