Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,355 posts)
36. Somebody please refresh me
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 06:57 PM
Nov 2019

Did Clinton lunch with Democratic Senators while in the midst of his Impeachment/Trial? And let's imagine what the Republicans would have said/done if he had?

Susan Collins is very disappointed jberryhill Nov 2019 #1
And that counts for.... guillaumeb Nov 2019 #7
Lol ... every mention of Collin's hollow missives .. mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #43
It has to be improper for him to bribe the jurors Evergreen Emerald Nov 2019 #2
And this should be a reason for the House to open an investigation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #8
That would be jury tampering in a real court. nt doc03 Nov 2019 #3
Asshole gets away with everything bluestarone Nov 2019 #4
There aren't charges yet, so I kinda doubt it ... mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #44
GTH Collins! MoonRiver Nov 2019 #5
Did he threaten to campaign for her? TheCowsCameHome Nov 2019 #6
They should be disqualified as jurors...nt 2naSalit Nov 2019 #9
Graham already stated that he will not even look at the evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #10
Sure, but if that was the case, a lot of Democrats would have been disqualified from acquitting onenote Nov 2019 #12
Democrats knew that Clinton's behavior did not THREATEN the National Security ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2019 #23
And that was after he 2naSalit Nov 2019 #18
Agreed. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #21
Exactly... 2naSalit Nov 2019 #25
We have two things here. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #26
And never the twain shall meet (nt) mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #46
There is no process for disqualifying a Senator onenote Nov 2019 #30
A bit of history and law. onenote Nov 2019 #11
Understood. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #14
They said the same thing about Nixon. It changed. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #17
Which is one reason that the House should continue the investigation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #20
They can start another at anytime. There's nothing in the Constitution stopping them. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #22
"I'm very concerned! ... Well ... actually ... not all that concerned ..." struggle4progress Nov 2019 #13
She is concerned..... guillaumeb Nov 2019 #15
Impeachment is a political act, not a legal act. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #16
Lindsay Graham already announced he would not look at any evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #19
Country is over, done. Democracy done, over. rule of law gone. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #28
There was a blue wave in 2018. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #31
Putin will decide if we even have power that day, let alone count votes. I wanna be wrong, I do. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #32
If he could, he would have done it in 2018. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #33
He did, no way Rump won those 4 states Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #42
Trump wasn't on the ballot in 2018 ;) (nt) mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #48
oops , i meant 16...and i misread Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #49
bye felicia jpak Nov 2019 #24
the women who will die in illegal abortions alone should haunt her till her miserable life is over Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #27
That might be possible, if she had any conscience. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #29
Susan Collins Raftergirl Nov 2019 #34
Outrageous. Ethics be damned. Firestorm49 Nov 2019 #35
Openly trying. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #38
Somebody please refresh me Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2019 #36
If Susan Collins were to attend an execution by firing squad DFW Nov 2019 #37
Well said. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #39
More quid pro quo....back me or I'll pull the funding. nt UniteFightBack Nov 2019 #40
True. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #41
Well I can only hope that Trump promised JDC Nov 2019 #45
I hope her opponent got a picture Orangepeel Nov 2019 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Impeachment Juror Susan C...»Reply #36