Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It takes 2/3rds of the senate to remove. unblock Dec 2019 #1
2/3rds of those present Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2019 #3
yeah, this is the kind of vote that only senators in a coma can miss. unblock Dec 2019 #5
If you're in a swing state, you'd rather have a drs appointment that day; Volaris Dec 2019 #33
More like you'd rather have heart surgery and be under general anaethsia that day. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2019 #40
Whatever is the excuse is fine with me lol, as long as the result is trump is gone. Volaris Dec 2019 #44
If only we could compel the recusal of accomplices ... n/t soldierant Dec 2019 #47
yes - but it only takes 51 to make approve the Trial Rules. CincyDem Dec 2019 #6
Excellent point. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2019 #41
True. But with the D's running the trial, there is a greater chance pnwmom Dec 2019 #17
Hmmm ... Mme. Defarge Dec 2019 #2
The Dems are saying we have to do it now, before the election because.... JoeOtterbein Dec 2019 #4
I feel your pain............. MyOwnPeace Dec 2019 #7
Bingo! Thanks cause... JoeOtterbein Dec 2019 #9
Any rules about only impeaching once? quakerboy Dec 2019 #12
+1000! nt JoeOtterbein Dec 2019 #14
Yes! Enough evidence is there to impeach for each Article of Impeachment! Tie that do-nothing ancianita Dec 2019 #38
Do we really want to give Trump.... SergeStorms Dec 2019 #43
+1000! JoeOtterbein Dec 2019 #45
Indeed. warmfeet Dec 2019 #46
I wish. But we know that the Senate will not convict. wnylib Dec 2019 #49
That's the rationale Pelosi is putting out for public consumption . . . . markpkessinger Dec 2019 #50
+1 JoeOtterbein Dec 2019 #51
If it is not required per the U.S. Constitution.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2019 #8
Something tells me that this is the plan. GoCubsGo Dec 2019 #10
He's gonna pull ugly shit no matter what the house/congress does and no matter what is good erronis Dec 2019 #31
Shit. Not a bad idea. Especially after we peel the Senate away from him. Just so long as Pence ... marble falls Dec 2019 #11
Not a bad idea, at all. burrowowl Dec 2019 #13
If enough negative sh*t comes out about Pence, ,, lastlib Dec 2019 #42
Subtitle to this thread: Sogo Dec 2019 #15
An excellent thought DonaldsRump Dec 2019 #16
I so much want Sogo Dec 2019 #18
That works for me. Go for it. oasis Dec 2019 #19
Dems need to play this like "Merrick Garland Revisited" Mr. Ected Dec 2019 #20
Exactly! Sogo Dec 2019 #21
100% agree. Keep Trump facing his trial in a Dem Senate vs gifting it now to Mitch & his SCOTUS. stuffmatters Dec 2019 #37
Kick! UCmeNdc Dec 2019 #22
That is precisely my thinking malaise Dec 2019 #23
I really like this idea! calimary Dec 2019 #24
I had to read this entire thread before this idea made sense to me... IndyOp Dec 2019 #25
I agree. Especially after the call logs only came out with the report. LiberalFighter Dec 2019 #29
Now that's a great idea duforsure Dec 2019 #26
I thought for awhile that waiting until after the election... kentuck Dec 2019 #27
I'm not sure they can do that... Wounded Bear Dec 2019 #28
The first part you may be right. LiberalFighter Dec 2019 #30
"But the House does have control in the trial as they do the prosecution." AncientGeezer Dec 2019 #55
Correct. Once voted it on it is automatically the business of the Senate grantcart Dec 2019 #32
Send it to the Senate, make GOP Senators defend the orange criminal, AND keep investigating. CaptainTruth Dec 2019 #34
Yes, let's do a Moscow Mitch maneuver...serves him right being that's he a worthless toady ... SWBTATTReg Dec 2019 #35
sounds like my plan scarytomcat Dec 2019 #36
Wouldn't it Rebl2 Dec 2019 #39
Have new impeachment hearings The Wizard Dec 2019 #48
You want to wind up the Dumsters....this is the way to do it. And the Press...apoplectic. AncientGeezer Dec 2019 #52
OK, Sogo Dec 2019 #53
You can't stop it..what JD suggested is a a wet dream. AncientGeezer Dec 2019 #54
In this instance, John Dean proves he doesn't know House procedural rules onenote Dec 2019 #56
Well, well, well..... Sogo Dec 2019 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OK, once again John Dean ...»Reply #13