Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

thinkingagain

(906 posts)

3. It felt like when I saw the summary

Reply to ancianita (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 2, 2020, 11:12 AM

Feb 2020

That you could change a few words and you'd have all those Boltons book and the senate impeachment.
It feels eerily the same.
So I'm not sure if it's a good thing or bad.

One they already ruled you could hide documents and evidence by saying they have security protection
And two it was later proven the don't.

Plus Adam Schiff kept saying the truth will come out
And the book show it it did.

Hope that helps.

But it also looked interesting and I wondered if anyone had read it and their take?

Sorry if I'm rambling I just woke up and am blurred eyed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I saw this book on Friday the same day the GOP said no to witnesses [View all] thinkingagain Feb 2020 OP

Wow. I am definitely going to add that book to my list of those to read... FM123 Feb 2020 #1

Are you saying we're looking at a similar case headed to SCOTUS with this precedent? If so, is it ancianita Feb 2020 #2

It felt like when I saw the summary thinkingagain Feb 2020 #3

If you're not a lawyer, we need one from DU to comment on its potential damage to constitutional ancianita Feb 2020 #4

Well I'm not a lawyer thinkingagain Feb 2020 #5

yep ancianita Feb 2020 #6