Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
4. You're right, but edited
Wed Feb 19, 2020, 10:18 AM
Feb 2020

Randy Rainbow seized control of my mind and will. I'll stop it.

On second thought, *I'm* not insulting them by implying they're female because I don't believe being called a female is an insult. *They* will feel insulted because they do believe that calling a man by a woman's name is insulting. They are creating the insult out of their own defective souls. It's like in junior high school, when being called a "brain" was a total put-down.

Roseanne Barr (the woman) is the last sister I would defend against anything. Her gender is not an insult; her beliefs and behavior are. Implying someone, male or female, is a "Roseanne Barr" is shorthand for saying that person is cruel, evil, venal and disgusting.

Roseanne is a woman? Were it not so.

Maybe I won't stop it after all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Somebody has pointed out ...»Reply #4