Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
17. That is bullshit
Fri Mar 6, 2020, 09:20 AM
Mar 2020

It's interesting how the same dumb stuff is circulated regardless of who is in office.

Just like your medical records, your academic records don't need to be "sealed". They are already private information which cannot be disclosed absent your consent or a court order.

Neither Trump nor Obama, or even you for that matter, needs to take any action to protect their confidential academic records.

https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The law applies to all schools that receive funds under an applicable program of the U.S. Department of Education.

FERPA gives parents certain rights with respect to their children's education records. These rights transfer to the student when he or she reaches the age of 18 or attends a school beyond the high school level. Students to whom the rights have transferred are "eligible students."

Parents or eligible students have the right to inspect and review the student's education records maintained by the school. Schools are not required to provide copies of records unless, for reasons such as great distance, it is impossible for parents or eligible students to review the records. Schools may charge a fee for copies.

Parents or eligible students have the right to request that a school correct records which they believe to be inaccurate or misleading. If the school decides not to amend the record, the parent or eligible student then has the right to a formal hearing. After the hearing, if the school still decides not to amend the record, the parent or eligible student has the right to place a statement with the record setting forth his or her view about the contested information.

Generally, schools must have written permission from the parent or eligible student in order to release any information from a student's education record. However, FERPA allows schools to disclose those records, without consent, to the following parties or under the following conditions (34 CFR § 99.31):
School officials with legitimate educational interest;
Other schools to which a student is transferring;
Specified officials for audit or evaluation purposes;
Appropriate parties in connection with financial aid to a student;
Organizations conducting certain studies for or on behalf of the school;
Accrediting organizations;
To comply with a judicial order or lawfully issued subpoena;
Appropriate officials in cases of health and safety emergencies; and
State and local authorities, within a juvenile justice system, pursuant to specific State law.

Schools may disclose, without consent, "directory" information such as a student's name, address, telephone number, date and place of birth, honors and awards, and dates of attendance. However, schools must tell parents and eligible students about directory information and allow parents and eligible students a reasonable amount of time to request that the school not disclose directory information about them. Schools must notify parents and eligible students annually of their rights under FERPA. The actual means of notification (special letter, inclusion in a PTA bulletin, student handbook, or newspaper article) is left to the discretion of each school.

K&R uponit7771 Mar 2020 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #2
The Supreme court turned that over. Check the date of your link because I think it's old. Maraya1969 Mar 2020 #3
Well, isn't it great that we have wnylib Mar 2020 #5
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #9
It was Federal Court in Sacramento, not the SCOTUS oldsoftie Mar 2020 #10
Oh. OK wnylib Mar 2020 #11
From the date of this original decision, apparently not. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #14
After posting, I thought that an appeal wnylib Mar 2020 #15
The appeal was dismissed as moot jberryhill Mar 2020 #34
No - It was not a federal court at all jberryhill Mar 2020 #29
They must have appealed then. The original decision was by a US District Court judge oldsoftie Mar 2020 #32
No.... jberryhill Mar 2020 #33
You're right Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #8
Of course they did. The Supremes are such tools of Trump Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #16
The history of ballot access laws is littered with attempts at discrimination against minorities jberryhill Mar 2020 #18
I thought the same thing exboyfil Mar 2020 #20
My favorite is "How about if we require a psychological fitness test?" jberryhill Mar 2020 #22
And yet there are laws that require the IRS to turn over to Congress his tax returns Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #21
That has nothing to do with whether a state can require it for ballot access jberryhill Mar 2020 #23
It has a lot to do with how the Supremes rule. Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #27
The Supreme Court never had their hands on this case jberryhill Mar 2020 #28
And let me introduce you to one of the people you just smeared jberryhill Mar 2020 #31
Is that Constitutional? jberryhill Mar 2020 #4
Unless its an urban myth, hasnt trump sealed ALL academic records? ALL of them? oldsoftie Mar 2020 #12
That is bullshit jberryhill Mar 2020 #17
Yes, they're private. But YOU can release them. Trump threatened anyone who MAY leak them: oldsoftie Mar 2020 #24
As well he should jberryhill Mar 2020 #25
You are right. And I certainly appreciate your objectivity. Its usually lacking here. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #30
SC will rule it invalid beachbumbob Mar 2020 #6
California SC already did AncientGeezer Mar 2020 #35
link pls dweller Mar 2020 #7
It was an old link SmartVoter22 Mar 2020 #13
They will soon face major cuts from trump to try and hurt them for this duforsure Mar 2020 #19
New York was also set to require release of tax returns Danascot Mar 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California Forces Trump t...»Reply #17