Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
22. My favorite is "How about if we require a psychological fitness test?"
Fri Mar 6, 2020, 09:51 AM
Mar 2020

Because, yeah, what we need is the "Bureau of Who Is Allowed To Run For Office" which will only be staffed by the highest-minded political appointees.

But I've realized that many people seem to operate under the remaining childlike notion that there are "adults in charge of things" somewhere who make sure all of the rules get followed.

I guess it is sort of a natural thing, since we spend a good deal of our lives as minors within the context of families, schools and other institutions that we simply trust to be under the control of "the people in charge of that sort of thing". From there, they go to work for similar hierarchical organizations where there are still "people in charge of that sort of thing".

They don't realize that once you get into the wider world, things operate on a totally different basis. What people can do is limited only by what they can get away with doing, and that whatever justice there is in the world is a dim circle of light around a flickering candle in a vast darkness.
K&R uponit7771 Mar 2020 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #2
The Supreme court turned that over. Check the date of your link because I think it's old. Maraya1969 Mar 2020 #3
Well, isn't it great that we have wnylib Mar 2020 #5
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #9
It was Federal Court in Sacramento, not the SCOTUS oldsoftie Mar 2020 #10
Oh. OK wnylib Mar 2020 #11
From the date of this original decision, apparently not. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #14
After posting, I thought that an appeal wnylib Mar 2020 #15
The appeal was dismissed as moot jberryhill Mar 2020 #34
No - It was not a federal court at all jberryhill Mar 2020 #29
They must have appealed then. The original decision was by a US District Court judge oldsoftie Mar 2020 #32
No.... jberryhill Mar 2020 #33
You're right Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #8
Of course they did. The Supremes are such tools of Trump Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #16
The history of ballot access laws is littered with attempts at discrimination against minorities jberryhill Mar 2020 #18
I thought the same thing exboyfil Mar 2020 #20
My favorite is "How about if we require a psychological fitness test?" jberryhill Mar 2020 #22
And yet there are laws that require the IRS to turn over to Congress his tax returns Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #21
That has nothing to do with whether a state can require it for ballot access jberryhill Mar 2020 #23
It has a lot to do with how the Supremes rule. Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #27
The Supreme Court never had their hands on this case jberryhill Mar 2020 #28
And let me introduce you to one of the people you just smeared jberryhill Mar 2020 #31
Is that Constitutional? jberryhill Mar 2020 #4
Unless its an urban myth, hasnt trump sealed ALL academic records? ALL of them? oldsoftie Mar 2020 #12
That is bullshit jberryhill Mar 2020 #17
Yes, they're private. But YOU can release them. Trump threatened anyone who MAY leak them: oldsoftie Mar 2020 #24
As well he should jberryhill Mar 2020 #25
You are right. And I certainly appreciate your objectivity. Its usually lacking here. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #30
SC will rule it invalid beachbumbob Mar 2020 #6
California SC already did AncientGeezer Mar 2020 #35
link pls dweller Mar 2020 #7
It was an old link SmartVoter22 Mar 2020 #13
They will soon face major cuts from trump to try and hurt them for this duforsure Mar 2020 #19
New York was also set to require release of tax returns Danascot Mar 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California Forces Trump t...»Reply #22