General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

28. The Supreme Court never had their hands on this case

Fri Mar 6, 2020, 10:17 AM

Mar 2020

I'm sorry, but this is just random ranting here with no connection to reality.

https://calmatters.org/blogs/california-election-2020/2019/11/california-trump-tax-return-law-struck-down/

Why California’s top court just struck down the state’s Trump tax return law

IT. WAS. THE. CALIFORNIA. STATE. SUPREME. COURT.

You want to know who appointed them? Do you give a shit who appointed them?

Here's the decision:

https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S257302.PDF

Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger and Groban concurred.

Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger and Groban were appointed by Jerry Brown.

FOUR out of SIX of the judges who struck down this law were appointed by Jerry Brown.

Do you know who Jerry Brown is?

Sick of this reflexive bullshit.

You are literally just making stuff up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California Forces Trump to release tax returns to get on Nov 2020 ballot [View all] SmartVoter22 Mar 2020 OP

K&R uponit7771 Mar 2020 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #2

The Supreme court turned that over. Check the date of your link because I think it's old. Maraya1969 Mar 2020 #3

Well, isn't it great that we have wnylib Mar 2020 #5

+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2020 #9

It was Federal Court in Sacramento, not the SCOTUS oldsoftie Mar 2020 #10

Oh. OK wnylib Mar 2020 #11

From the date of this original decision, apparently not. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #14

After posting, I thought that an appeal wnylib Mar 2020 #15

The appeal was dismissed as moot jberryhill Mar 2020 #34

No - It was not a federal court at all jberryhill Mar 2020 #29

They must have appealed then. The original decision was by a US District Court judge oldsoftie Mar 2020 #32

No.... jberryhill Mar 2020 #33

You're right Hiawatha Pete Mar 2020 #8

Of course they did. The Supremes are such tools of Trump Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #16

The history of ballot access laws is littered with attempts at discrimination against minorities jberryhill Mar 2020 #18

I thought the same thing exboyfil Mar 2020 #20

My favorite is "How about if we require a psychological fitness test?" jberryhill Mar 2020 #22

And yet there are laws that require the IRS to turn over to Congress his tax returns Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #21

That has nothing to do with whether a state can require it for ballot access jberryhill Mar 2020 #23

It has a lot to do with how the Supremes rule. Farmer-Rick Mar 2020 #27

The Supreme Court never had their hands on this case jberryhill Mar 2020 #28

And let me introduce you to one of the people you just smeared jberryhill Mar 2020 #31

Is that Constitutional? jberryhill Mar 2020 #4

Unless its an urban myth, hasnt trump sealed ALL academic records? ALL of them? oldsoftie Mar 2020 #12

That is bullshit jberryhill Mar 2020 #17

Yes, they're private. But YOU can release them. Trump threatened anyone who MAY leak them: oldsoftie Mar 2020 #24

As well he should jberryhill Mar 2020 #25

You are right. And I certainly appreciate your objectivity. Its usually lacking here. oldsoftie Mar 2020 #30

SC will rule it invalid beachbumbob Mar 2020 #6

California SC already did AncientGeezer Mar 2020 #35

link pls dweller Mar 2020 #7

It was an old link SmartVoter22 Mar 2020 #13

They will soon face major cuts from trump to try and hurt them for this duforsure Mar 2020 #19

New York was also set to require release of tax returns Danascot Mar 2020 #26