Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(115,656 posts)

4. He has nothing to do with it.

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 03:12 PM

Mar 2020

It wouldn't be changed by legislation (which includes the House) because the Senate sets its own rules and they can decide for themselves.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Presumably he'd have to sign a bill for it DrToast Mar 2020 #1

No, the Senate sets its own rules. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2020 #5

It's going to require money. That means a bill DrToast Mar 2020 #8

Separation of powers malaise Mar 2020 #7

That would push his and Mitch's 'Robber Barron' bill through. nt woodsprite Mar 2020 #2

...and I support his execution for treason? Brainfodder Mar 2020 #3

He has nothing to do with it. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2020 #4

It's a formality, a photo op. procon Mar 2020 #6

He's King, don't you know? Cartoonist Mar 2020 #10

He's made himself irrelevant due to his inaction and lies htuttle Mar 2020 #12