So, he believes in "science" when it comes to conception (Reply #17)

In the discussion thread: Santorum: there's no argument on the science that life begins at conception [View all]

Response to Dragonbreathp9d (Original post)

Sat Jan 7, 2012, 04:16 PM

Proud Liberal Dem (20,722 posts)

17. So, he believes in "science" when it comes to conception

but not when it comes to global warming. Alrighty then!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

42 replies	Author	Time	Post
Santorum: there's no argument on the science that life begins at conception [View all]	Dragonbreathp9d	Jan 2012	OP
If you don't want there to be an argument, you just say..	louis-t	Jan 2012	#1
Another Santorism--if you just think about sex you	asjr	Jan 2012	#2
There's serious argument as to whether life begins at ADULTHOOD.	saras	Jan 2012	#3
Another day, another lie in Santorum world.	Zoeisright	Jan 2012	#4
Sperm are alive	Angry Dragon	Jan 2012	#5
well it's a sin to	mzteris	Jan 2012	#32
As a matter of fact, there IS science that says otherwise.	CTyankee	Jan 2012	#6
lol, I would like to see the citation for that fact. n/t	wildeyed	Jan 2012	#7
The potential for life begins at conception.	Old and In the Way	Jan 2012	#8
ANUS PAINUS should STFU instead of convincing us of his head up his ass feels good...dumb fuck	opihimoimoi	Jan 2012	#9
I always find it amusing when Republicans are adamant about this.	Aerows	Jan 2012	#10
I don't think science supports his statement. . .	mzteris	Jan 2012	#33
Oh I think it is certainly debatable	Aerows	Jan 2012	#34
it's not even REMOTELY debatable . . .	mzteris	Jan 2012	#39
That life begins at conception?	Aerows	Jan 2012	#40
Santorum is claiming	mzteris	Jan 2012	#42
Nobody fucking asked him!	Quantess	Jan 2012	#11
well actually...	handmade34	Jan 2012	#15
If this question were in a more neutral context, I might be interested in a more thoughtful analysis	Quantess	Jan 2012	#21
...	handmade34	Jan 2012	#28
That makes three of us!	Aerows	Jan 2012	#36
Yet there are so many examples where he is amoral	Aerows	Jan 2012	#35
Yes, and that's what we need to be talking about.	Quantess	Jan 2012	#41
These gametes should be paying their taxes then	MrScorpio	Jan 2012	#12
Of course he said that, he is a zygote fetishist	The Genealogist	Jan 2012	#13
An egg lives, a cell lives, and a woman lives. Which do we value most?	David__77	Jan 2012	#14
The most perfect synopsys of the issue I've ever seen to state how I feel about it.	SmileyRose	Jan 2012	#16
+1	Proud Liberal Dem	Jan 2012	#18
PP doesn't like to be too ideologically confrontational.	David__77	Jan 2012	#22
when republicans	handmade34	Jan 2012	#20
So, he believes in "science" when it comes to conception	Proud Liberal Dem	Jan 2012	#17
+1000 nt	abelenkpe	Jan 2012	#26
But pregnancy does not begin until implantation. n/t	moriah	Jan 2012	#19
If so, then menstruation is one of the most common causes of death	quaker bill	Jan 2012	#23
what an idiot...	handmade34	Jan 2012	#24
Egg & sperm are alive before conception and life continues. Whether those elements have some	jody	Jan 2012	#25
He sure talks about sex a lot.	Fire Walk With Me	Jan 2012	#27
he's not getting any	demtenjeep	Jan 2012	#29
I'd imagine he isn't	Aerows	Jan 2012	#38
This message was self-deleted by its author	Tesha	Jan 2012	#30
What Tesha said. n/t	jody	Jan 2012	#31
His wife had a second trimester abortion	Aerows	Jan 2012	#37

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.