Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (Suze Orman)Apparently Poor & Middle Class People Shouldn't Have Babies [View all]rocktivity
(44,571 posts)7. While their intentions are honorable, their priorities are out of whack
Last edited Tue Nov 21, 2023, 07:18 PM - Edit history (7)
I applaud the couple's not wanting to have their next child "by accident." But I think it's WAY too soon for them to have another one given their financial situation and the economy in general.
Their annual outlay exceeds their annual intake by more than ten THOUSAND dollars -- THAT'S the problem they should be focusing on solving. Bolstering their security (both financially AND logistically) is what they should be devoting themselves to over the next few years.
rocktivity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(Suze Orman)Apparently Poor & Middle Class People Shouldn't Have Babies [View all]
The Straight Story
Dec 2011
OP
Many, many people work on different shifts and their families do just fine. It takes a lot of extra
Brickbat
Dec 2011
#12
they may want their child to have siblings to grow up with, to teach, to learn from, etc.
CreekDog
Dec 2011
#22
"Their expenses are $6500/mo. They make $5600/mo" Obviously that's not working.
alphafemale
Dec 2011
#3
Your response illustrates what (for me) is so despicable about those contemplating having children
Uranus Needs Men
Dec 2011
#11
Forgoing a second child will not solve their income/spending problem. She should address that first.
Brickbat
Dec 2011
#20
They are running $900 in the red every month. Until they can get that straightened out,
iris27
Dec 2011
#21
I agree, though I haven't read her exact words. It's much more expensive to have children
napi21
Dec 2011
#26