General Discussion

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)

2. You certainly seem to not understand my posts. Why exactly?

Reply to Rule of Claw (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 26, 2020, 08:00 AM

Sep 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The false link between Amy Coney Barrett and The Handmaid's Tale, explained: vox.com [View all] DonaldsRump Sep 2020 OP

You certainly seem quite Rule of Claw Sep 2020 #1

You certainly seem to not understand my posts. Why exactly? DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #2

Distinction without a Difference. The point remains. hlthe2b Sep 2020 #3

This is not a right-wing talking point DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #4

Both groups hold similar premises. Most of us realize this is a distinction without a difference hlthe2b Sep 2020 #5

What exactly am I pushing? DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #6

Yeah, sure. hlthe2b Sep 2020 #7

Sooo, Coney's not a wich ... That's good to know uponit7771 Sep 2020 #8

the article linked... uriel1972 Sep 2020 #9

That's exactly right DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #12

I see nobody on here except this post Sunsky Sep 2020 #37

I do agree with that...that's fundamentally the point of my OP DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #39

In evolutionary biology, we call it convergent evolution NickB79 Sep 2020 #10

The article cites opinions of the left and right on religion, tavernier Sep 2020 #11

OP is clearly not defending Barrett Tones2345 Sep 2020 #13

Then YOU should post the difference in practice and philosophy of the two groups and Barrett-- hlthe2b Sep 2020 #14

Again, the sole issue here is the inspiration for a book and a TV show DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #16

I think we all know what this is about. You claim you know inspiration for a book for which author hlthe2b Sep 2020 #17

And again. You claim the article is correct and agree with its conclusion, though provided NO proof hlthe2b Sep 2020 #20

I am not defending anything DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #23

You continually defend an article that concludes that which is not proven. hlthe2b Sep 2020 #24

And why are you not reading the posts? DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #25

They are repetetive, but I certainly have. You made your position absolutely clear hlthe2b Sep 2020 #26

and I won't forget the absurdity of this discussion DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #29

You discount the author's own words on this matter. Yeah, that's not absurd! hlthe2b Sep 2020 #31

I am not defending anything (second time) DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #34

I find calling out those who believe this a distinction without a difference hlthe2b Sep 2020 #35

There is nothing remotely offensive in what I have said DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #38

Precisely... uriel1972 Sep 2020 #18

What does that mean exactly? Dr. Strange Sep 2020 #40

I just posted that same link and quote below DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #42

the author of article uriel1972 Sep 2020 #55

Good lord. Give it up. You were wrong, and just admit it. DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #60

Ah, okay. Dr. Strange Sep 2020 #61

It may not have been the literal inspiration but it is a group that Bettie Sep 2020 #15

What are you talking about??? DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #19

Just to mention DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #44

It's Charismatic Catholicism: the adoption of Pentacostal and Evangelical pathologies by Catholics Klaralven Sep 2020 #21

Thos is getting to be a "Gungeon" argument... uriel1972 Sep 2020 #22

The head of the women's groups were called octoberlib Sep 2020 #27

+1 hlthe2b Sep 2020 #28

It is relevant if that is the point you are discussing DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #32

She's insane. GeorgeGist Sep 2020 #30

I think we can agree on that at least... nt uriel1972 Sep 2020 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author sarcasmo Sep 2020 #36

Just to hopefully bring this to a close DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #41

"It was a different one but the same idea." - Atwood radius777 Sep 2020 #63

+1 MrsCoffee Sep 2020 #64

Who cares if they call themselves People of Hope, People of Praise or People who Hate Women? MrsCoffee Sep 2020 #43

Different strokes for different folks... DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #45

Except you might be missing the bigger point. MrsCoffee Sep 2020 #46

I am not disagreeing with that. DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #47

Fox, National Review, Washington Examiner are gonna say whatever the fuck they want. MrsCoffee Sep 2020 #48

It was "sympathy" for Brett Kavanaugh DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #49

Handmaids are a part of her little cult. I will keep referring to it. MrsCoffee Sep 2020 #50

Absolutely: that's exactly what they were called in her cult until the TV show come on the air DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #52

You seem to be (a) grasping at the 'false link' narrative radius777 Sep 2020 #65

It feels like a difference between the People's Front of Judea and the Judean People's Front !!! OnDoutside Sep 2020 #51

at least they aren't the Popular Front of Judea... uriel1972 Sep 2020 #53

Don't get me started on them .... OnDoutside Sep 2020 #54

There's actually nothing funny about this DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #56

don't be obtuse uriel1972 Sep 2020 #57

Please don't be so condescending about being "obtuse" DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #59

As a Catholic, I think it IS hilarious. There are lots of rwnj cults OnDoutside Sep 2020 #62

*snort* smirkymonkey Sep 2020 #66

It is NOT a "small Catholic group." It is a small group that contains a mixture pnwmom Sep 2020 #58