Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,721 posts)

2. I already replied on the other thread... but I'll add this

Wed Oct 28, 2020, 07:54 AM

Oct 2020

Guess who gets to weigh in on "legislation to maybe change the way the SC operates"?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Might be worth a shot Sherman A1 Oct 2020 #1

I already replied on the other thread... but I'll add this FBaggins Oct 2020 #2

Yep Miguelito Loveless Oct 2020 #3

But they would need a case to hear with this fact scenario at issue Mr. Ected Oct 2020 #7

A suit will be filed by the GOP Miguelito Loveless Oct 2020 #14

not after jan 20. mopinko Oct 2020 #8

I doubt it FBaggins Oct 2020 #11

Nope. It's explicitly in the Constitution, Article 3. Congress decides. lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #15

No it doesn't FBaggins Oct 2020 #16

I had understood the question to be about the size/jusridiction. lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #17

That's not strictly true FBaggins Oct 2020 #5

But on what grounds? Buckeyeblue Oct 2020 #6

Impeachment works for me. Fastest way to re-balance the court. rgbecker Oct 2020 #9

How is impeachment the fastest way to re-balance the court? dware Oct 2020 #10

Long shot for sure. I'm always hopeful. rgbecker Oct 2020 #12

Always being hopeful is good, dware Oct 2020 #13