There is a big difference between packing the courts and (Reply #15)

In the discussion thread: Supreme Court [View all]

Response to Progressive2020 (Original post)

Sat Nov 14, 2020, 12:40 PM

Bev54 (2,667 posts)

15. There is a big difference between packing the courts and

restoring the courts. New Justices need to be added to restore the courts and it is time for it to be expanded anyway. This whole conversation will be moot if the dems do not win the senate so that is the first fight, the next fight will be statehood for DC and PR to add more senators so the dems do not have to rely on the likes of Joe Manchin to get things done. The court needs stability and term limits do not give them that. Instead nominations should be made to require certain standards and totally non- partisan.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

30 replies	Author	Time	Post
Supreme Court [View all]	Progressive2020	Nov 2020	OP
this	llashram	Nov 2020	#1
How about scotus by natioinal public election every 4 years	SheltieLover	Nov 2020	#2
Maybe	Progressive2020	Nov 2020	#5
Senate confirmation is the operative	SheltieLover	Nov 2020	#8
Pack? They did the packing, we would be levelling. And no, your idea means	Eliot Rosewater	Nov 2020	#3
This. nt	Atticus	Nov 2020	#10
Ii is a mistake to not do something with the	Alpeduez21	Nov 2020	#4
We have one Democratic Senator who said no	jimfields33	Nov 2020	#16
And that's only if we win both GA Senate seats	Polybius	Nov 2020	#23
Accurate point for sure	jimfields33	Nov 2020	#25
In the constitution aren't justices appointed for life?	icwlmuscyia	Nov 2020	#6
SCOTUS term limits would require a Constitutional amendment	DonaldsRump	Nov 2020	#7
We're way past the point of thinking Republican will observe any norms.	unblock	Nov 2020	#9
Scotus	rso	Nov 2020	#11
It would also keep the justices closer to the age of the general population.	Binkie The Clown	Nov 2020	#12
There is a big difference between packing the courts and	Bev54	Nov 2020	#13
The GOP has already packed the court.	iemitsu	Nov 2020	#14
There is a big difference between packing the courts and	Bev54	Nov 2020	#15
This message was self-deleted by its author	NoRoadUntravelled	Nov 2020	#17
That would take a Constitutional amendment	StarfishSaver	Nov 2020	#18
There are 13 circuit courts. I think having 13 Supremes is reasonable. The 13 circuits are a	Ninga	Nov 2020	#19
They need to act ruthlessly and ignore the howls from the NYT and WAPO.	BlueNProud	Nov 2020	#20
Appoint number of justices equal to number of courts	MyMission	Nov 2020	#21
There will be no attempt at expanding the Supreme Court, at least until after 2022	Polybius	Nov 2020	#22
We will be in a worse position in 2022	LostOne4Ever	Nov 2020	#24
It would be far more than "changing his mind" if he reversed positions	Polybius	Nov 2020	#27
Maybe if SCotUS made a particularly bad decision	LostOne4Ever	Nov 2020	#28
You have a lot more hope than I do	Polybius	Nov 2020	#29
Actually my hope is pretty minimal	LostOne4Ever	Nov 2020	#30
That would require a constitutional amendment.	Statistical	Nov 2020	#26

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.