Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We needed a Roosevelt, but we got an Obama [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)15. After the 10th or 20th "Obama isn't FDR" OP ...
Well .... I'll use your words ... I find them ... "So empty. Shallow. Content free."
Obama didn't do something to create an actual outrage, so its time to manufacture some.
And that's my opinion. I hope you understand that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And you think the right-wing Republicans and conservadems in Congress are going to stop?
NYC Liberal
Jan 2012
#8
What element of our law requires that a President hold his tongue until Congress is
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2012
#11
No but voting the bad politicians OUT and voting good ones IN will get things done.
NYC Liberal
Jan 2012
#34
That is absurd. FDR had a triple digit majority in the House, and 76 seats in the Senate. He could
BzaDem
Jan 2012
#44
Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk. Ka-chunk.....
Ikonoklast
Jan 2012
#28
Since he campaigns and devotes resources to his obstructors and NEVER calls them out
TheKentuckian
Jan 2012
#26
Where is the content in the OP? I just see hyperbolic statements and a lot of spin strung together
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#23
FDR OKed the mass slaughter of German & Japanese civilians via bombing raids on their cities.
Scurrilous
Jan 2012
#29