Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(2,574 posts)

25. Wrong about what, exactly?

Sat Dec 12, 2020, 01:12 PM

Dec 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How can the 106 Republicans be sworn in when they can't swear to defend the Constitution? [View all] onecaliberal Dec 2020 OP

They cannot. Serious answer. It would be a lie. bullimiami Dec 2020 #1

They lie in their sleep, this will be just one more. Ferrets are Cool Dec 2020 #2

This. Biophilic Dec 2020 #3

126 moondust Dec 2020 #4

If any hold a license to practice law Ferryboat Dec 2020 #5

Good point. Hadn't thought of that. onecaliberal Dec 2020 #7

Perjury refers to sworn testimony given in a court proceeding StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #23

Because they live by a double standard. William769 Dec 2020 #6

I agree. It cannot stand. onecaliberal Dec 2020 #9

"Perjury" StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #19

There has to be a price to pay. onecaliberal Dec 2020 #11

Totally agree. Sogo Dec 2020 #13

Because the oath is a promise of what they're going to do in the future StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #12

They didn't "sign a lawsuit" StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #15

The VOTERS' will in those 126 was to have those Members represent them StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #29

The states in question were won by Biden, so no onecaliberal Dec 2020 #30

Seems you want a lawsuit filed to overturn their election. LanternWaste Dec 2020 #18

Ain't it, though? StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #21

Disagree. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, Roisin Ni Fiachra Dec 2020 #22

You can disagree all you want. The law is the law and you're wrong StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #24

Wrong about what, exactly? Roisin Ni Fiachra Dec 2020 #25

Read my post and then read your response disagreeing with it StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #26

Meh. You are avoiding answering my question, Roisin Ni Fiachra Dec 2020 #27

"if not seating them is a possibility" onenote Dec 2020 #34

They can hide behind legal technicality treestar Dec 2020 #32