Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

18. There's nothing to be decided in the Supreme Court

Reply to global1 (Reply #15)

Thu Dec 24, 2020, 03:04 PM

Dec 2020

The Constitution is very clear and speaks for itself.

The Supreme Court can't just change the meaning of a Constitutional provision because someone doesn't like it or challenges it. Laws can be challenged on the ground that they violate the Constitution but the Constitution is what it is and the only way to challenge it is to change it through the amendment process.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need a New Constitutional Amendment [View all] Captain Zero Dec 2020 OP

I fear there will be more BS impeachments Freddie Dec 2020 #1

we never will be able to pass an amendment ever again drray23 Dec 2020 #2

+1000 Celerity Dec 2020 #20

Bad move StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #3

If It Can Be Proven That A Person's Intention Was To Be Corrupt From The Start And In The End..... global1 Dec 2020 #7

I agree that he is using the pardon to obstruct justice StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #9

Then This Needs To Be Decided In The Supreme Court.... global1 Dec 2020 #15

There's nothing to be decided in the Supreme Court StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #18

Why? onenote Dec 2020 #4

Under this scenario, a bare majority of Congress could kneecap a president at will StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #11

There's a fundamental Catch-22 tripping up this proposal. Towlie Dec 2020 #5

If We Can Look For Good From This 4 Year Disaster Of A Trump Administration - Trump Taught Us All... global1 Dec 2020 #6

It's all too easy to propose a Constitutional amendment. MineralMan Dec 2020 #8

+1 StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #12

So Bill Clinton should have been denied pardon power? brooklynite Dec 2020 #10

Can you imagine the havoc Republican House would have wreaked on Clinton or Obama StarfishSaver Dec 2020 #13

IMHO it is an extremely bad idea sarisataka Dec 2020 #14

Counter offer TheFarseer Dec 2020 #16

So no pardons in a president's second term onenote Dec 2020 #17

2nd term doesn't count as a lame duck session in my proposal TheFarseer Dec 2020 #21

Every "an impeached president loses XXX power" argument encourages "strategic" impeachments JHB Dec 2020 #19