Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dweller

(23,623 posts)
8. Why Socialism ?
Tue Dec 29, 2020, 08:38 PM
Dec 2020

Albert Einstein

Man is, at one and the same time, a solitary being and a social being. As a solitary being, he attempts to protect his own existence and that of those who are closest to him, to satisfy his personal desires, and to develop his innate abilities.
As a social being, he seeks to gain the recognition and affection of his fellow human beings, to share in their pleasures, to comfort them in their sorrows, and to improve their conditions of life. Only the existence of these varied, frequently conflicting, strivings accounts for the special character of a man, and their specific combination determines the extent to which an individual can achieve an inner equilibrium and can contribute to the well-being of society.
It is quite possible that the relative strength of these two drives is, in the main, fixed by inheritance. But the personality that finally emerges is largely formed by the environment in which a man happens to find himself during his development, by the structure of the society in which he grows up, by the tradition of that society, and by its appraisal of particular types of behavior. The abstract concept “society” means to the individual human being the sum total of his direct and indirect relations to his contemporaries and to all the people of earlier generations.
The individual is able to think, feel, strive, and work by himself; but he depends so much upon society—in his physical, intellectual, and emotional existence—that it is impossible to think of him, or to understand him, outside the framework of society. It is “society” which provides man with food, clothing, a home, the tools of work, language, the forms of thought, and most of the content of thought; his life is made possible through the labor and the accomplishments of the many millions past and present who are all hidden behind the small word “society.”

snip

The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals.

Much more at link
https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

✌🏻

He's not explaining socialism. He's explaining... JHB Dec 2020 #1
He is certainly not explaining those who identify as socialists. My Pet Orangutan Dec 2020 #3
Yes. Those are proven liberal progressive programs, not Hortensis Dec 2020 #10
Get the message across now. BSdetect Dec 2020 #2
Even Eisenhower got this..... OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2020 #4
None of these listed were socialized. That's why Truman made fun of Hortensis Dec 2020 #11
Biden won the election by laughing off the idea that HE was a Socialist... brooklynite Dec 2020 #5
Specifically which politicians would it "be helpful" to? LanternWaste Dec 2020 #7
Give 'em hell Harry! captain queeg Dec 2020 #6
Why Socialism ? dweller Dec 2020 #8
He wrote that in 1949 but died in 1955, so he didn't live to see Hortensis Dec 2020 #12
Which the Big Con and his trumpers and trumpets tried to do to America... pbmus Dec 2020 #13
We already had our revolution, and peoples around the planet Hortensis Dec 2020 #14
Falling oil prices, US economic sanctions, corruption, etc. progressoid Dec 2020 #21
Of course it is. But it'd be outrageously dishonest Hortensis Dec 2020 #22
The police state stage is not unique to socialism. progressoid Dec 2020 #23
And Nazis. moondust Dec 2020 #9
They were never truly socialist. They just used the word because socialists at the time was liked rockfordfile Dec 2020 #18
That's the purpose: repeat a positive term as if it's negative, over and over erronis Dec 2020 #15
Anyone who can't tell the difference between authoritarian socialism and democratic socialism Maisondeschatsnoirs Dec 2020 #16
Well, for one no nations exist with democratic socialist governments. Hortensis Dec 2020 #19
Charles Koch's worst nightmare. NEOBuckeye Dec 2020 #17
Truth-Telling Hell. czarjak Dec 2020 #20
Harry Nails It colsohlibgal Dec 2020 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Harry Truman explains Soc...»Reply #8