General Discussion

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)

63. maybe.

Reply to Logical (Reply #21)

Sat Oct 6, 2012, 06:47 PM

Oct 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

86 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can we all agree to stand our ground after the next debate? [View all] gulliver Oct 2012 OP

Agreed wholeheartedly! DemzRock Oct 2012 #1

I didn't watch Current for the debates, but . . . Shae Oct 2012 #61

Disagree! Glitterati Oct 2012 #2

I kind of like DU and don't think it is "far off track" gulliver Oct 2012 #3

The Grover Norquist stuff is simple Glitterati Oct 2012 #6

Good post, Glittarati Vietnameravet Oct 2012 #12

Thanks! Glitterati Oct 2012 #13

Get a fucking grip lunatica Oct 2012 #28

LOL, you're telling ME to get a grip? Glitterati Oct 2012 #29

I sure am lunatica Oct 2012 #32

I have a very firm grip on sanity Glitterati Oct 2012 #37

Says the person who jumps off cliffs with hair on fire lunatica Oct 2012 #40

'Fraid not. Glitterati Oct 2012 #42

Wow...you are on hair-trigger. Lighten up and get a grip both. n/t xocet Oct 2012 #62

Oh, you're just so silly. Glitterati Oct 2012 #75

God forbid they should work to get a Democrat elected. Cary Oct 2012 #33

Are you responding to me? lunatica Oct 2012 #43

I was agreeing with you. Cary Oct 2012 #82

OK. Thanks for clarifying that lunatica Oct 2012 #83

That was a great post........ plethoro Oct 2012 #59

We can't agree on anything. MADem Oct 2012 #4

Four more years Glitterati Oct 2012 #9

That's one thing all of us, save the odd concern trolls, can agree upon~! nt MADem Oct 2012 #20

WE just have to work harder Glitterati Oct 2012 #23

excellent grasswire Oct 2012 #5

I only watched 10 minutes Glitterati Oct 2012 #11

K & R! lonestarnot Oct 2012 #7

He needs to have our back, too. woo me with science Oct 2012 #8

Hahaha. Snort. Haha. WOLF!!! DevonRex Oct 2012 #16

You actually think what we post here is going to change anything? cali Oct 2012 #10

I actually do think that. gulliver Oct 2012 #14

holier than thou graham4anything Oct 2012 #24

Easy to blame "holier than thou" tama Oct 2012 #58

there is that ralph nader line again. graham4anything Oct 2012 #65

There are differences tama Oct 2012 #66

they want us to all clap and shout "good answer, good answer" 2pooped2pop Oct 2012 #67

LOL, this really makes me laugh...... Logical Oct 2012 #15

"Reality is an eye opener sometimes" gulliver Oct 2012 #18

Polls are tighter. No doubt about it. And the press has been good for Romney for the first time.... Logical Oct 2012 #21

maybe. robinlynne Oct 2012 #63

Obama kicked Mittens ass. Though it takes smart people looking 9 steps ahead to see it graham4anything Oct 2012 #31

Hmmm, sounds more like "3D Chess" stuff to me again. Not a fan of it. Logical Oct 2012 #36

read Paul Waldman's "Fraud" about the Bush family graham4anything Oct 2012 #48

What a shitload of tinfoil BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #52

I am not into conspiracy theories. I am into fact. Fact=Obama won graham4anything Oct 2012 #53

Exaggeration fanfan0711 Oct 2012 #81

I've got his back. Unlike some here. Nt DevonRex Oct 2012 #17

The Emperors New Clothes etherealtruth Oct 2012 #19

Which Emperor was naked this time tho? gulliver Oct 2012 #30

Clearly, you perceived Obama's performance as strong and powerful etherealtruth Oct 2012 #44

"He is capable of much better." gulliver Oct 2012 #50

I have his back. CakeGrrl Oct 2012 #22

I personally think some here are not who they proport to be graham4anything Oct 2012 #41

Bingo n/t politicasista Oct 2012 #70

No, because that's nonsense. No one "fed him to the wolves." The debate did not go well. DirkGently Oct 2012 #25

This would be an excellent OP etherealtruth Oct 2012 #27

Wow! An excellent post. Glitterati Oct 2012 #35

Emotions play tricks with the truth usually. gulliver Oct 2012 #39

I agree there was "substance" point to make & think we made it. DirkGently Oct 2012 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #45

I've had his back all along lunatica Oct 2012 #26

Totally agree. Cary Oct 2012 #38

Well if you mean lack of integrity or quality of integrity lunatica Oct 2012 #46

the only thing willard didn't do is wag his wienie NJCher Oct 2012 #79

What, and miss the next righteous rant from WilliamPitt? LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #34

I do not belong to an organized political party Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #47

ABSOLUTELY agree. I was so sorry that I even read DU as the debate was progressing Raine Oct 2012 #51

As the next one is town-hall format, I expect less opportunity for clash, so it is likely that patrice Oct 2012 #54

Thank you it is the spin we need to win awake Oct 2012 #55

DU is not the media and does not control it. former9thward Oct 2012 #56

We have to be honest even if it hurts sevenseas Oct 2012 #57

Honesty would include an effort to understand where one and one's cohoert stands in the patrice Oct 2012 #60

Obama blew it The Old Creak Oct 2012 #64

IMO, he didn't politicasista Oct 2012 #69

At this point, it's about the game The Old Creak Oct 2012 #74

He will be fine n/t politicasista Oct 2012 #77

Some of us expect Aerows Oct 2012 #68

Send this memo to MSNBC, Current, etc., etc... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #71

And you want a repeat of that performance? Or a threepeat? dkf Oct 2012 #72

You're kidding yourself, and the Dems are not (LETTERS FROM THE PARTY) jsmirman Oct 2012 #73

I reserve my right to criticize either candidate exboyfil Oct 2012 #76

I agree, and I was one of the ones letting it get to me. Lifelong Protester Oct 2012 #78

Sick of it. handsofthedevil Oct 2012 #80

The Creator Gave Me A Perfectly Good Brain . . . Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 #84

the truth should always trump political allegiances quinnox Oct 2012 #85

Some of us need rubber sheeting to get through these things, And some of us keep our heads and msanthrope Oct 2012 #86