Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I need some debunking help, arguing against math-based claims of voter fraud in PA [View all]greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)24. Don't waste your time arguing with idiots and bad faith fascists
That's my advice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I need some debunking help, arguing against math-based claims of voter fraud in PA [View all]
Bucky
Jan 2021
OP
Brings to mind an aphorism from the office...there's liars, damn liars and statisticians. lol n/t
CincyDem
Jan 2021
#1
It's in the article. They're reporting an unlikely occurrence of DOBs on the 5th, 10th, 15th, & 20th
Bucky
Jan 2021
#8
I don't know of any Snopes or anything..the amount of data here is too much for an amateur
LeftInTX
Jan 2021
#28
I thought of that, but the "default date" computerized registrations use are always the 1st...
Bucky
Jan 2021
#17
The full article does. It's the high frequency of DOBs landing on the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, etc
Bucky
Jan 2021
#18
Everything they use to "expose" fraud ends up being 100% horseshit. Don't even play the game.
kysrsoze
Jan 2021
#11
I'm dealing with someone being suckered into their worldview, not the bullshitters themselves
Bucky
Jan 2021
#21
This is good, but I'm good at doing those types of meta arguments. They're not persuasive.
Bucky
Jan 2021
#41
You are most likely wasting your time. These people get angry when presented with
Irish_Dem
Jan 2021
#42