Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msfiddlestix

(7,278 posts)
9. It would at least sever his campaign fundraising abilities signifcantly
Mon Feb 15, 2021, 10:41 AM
Feb 2021

which is not a small matter, number one.

Number two: it would also prevent him from ever taking office anywhere ever.

Number three: I believe I understand to be true, that all tax payer benefits including secret service protections, legal claims to intelligence briefings even his health care benefits would end. At least that's what I've read a number of times, I have never fact checked those claims though.

Number four: it helps to have him legally prevented from ever holding office, there by (theoretically) tamping down radical extremists from succeeding in their political aims, I think it helps.

(I'm not suggesting this would eradicate the extremists that have been unleashed, but I think it would help mitigated to some extent.)

Finally: It will damage the "brand" name in the political sphere to the extent that Donnie Junior and Ivanka and the rest of the corrupt clan will have the level of baggage that should at least hurt their chances of electoral victories.. at least that's possible.

My thoughts on this is of course all theoretical. perhaps.



It would have prevented him from running again. Turin_C3PO Feb 2021 #1
It wouldn't have prevented him from running again StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #2
I agree, wouldn't have stopped him at all. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #4
Good points. Turin_C3PO Feb 2021 #5
Exactly StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #8
1) Disqualification from holding office Under The Radar Feb 2021 #3
Why do you think disqualification from holding office would have stopped him from running StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #6
Chump "runs" because he grifts from the campaign donations FakeNoose Feb 2021 #7
It would at least sever his campaign fundraising abilities signifcantly msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #9
My thoughts StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #11
On the question of benefits post removal msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #15
The issue of benefits is governed by statute, not the Constitution StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #16
Well, that's most unfortunate. msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #17
It is unfortunate, but there's still hope for some accountability StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #18
I don't get all this focus on the final vote when one main benefit was embarrassing Republicans servermsh Feb 2021 #10
And I don't get why you believe that an "impeachment committee" is the only way to expose evidence StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #12
We're all adults here. We all knew the MAGATS would never convict their GOD EMPEROR DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2021 #13
If the Marmalade Fuck Face runs again, of course he will win Albama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and world wide wally Feb 2021 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assume for the sake of ar...»Reply #9