Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
73. Like it was said above, something worse
Mon Feb 22, 2021, 08:16 PM
Feb 2021

and more insulting than a name he could actually have claim to use.

Up next on M$NBC- Mrs. Greenspan lauds the "free markets" of high electricity prices. Comfortably_Numb Feb 2021 #1
Misogyny is alive and well on DU question everything Feb 2021 #37
Wow that escalated quickly. If that's misogyny to you maybe you need to adjust your threshold. Comfortably_Numb Feb 2021 #40
Andrea Mitchell, the Right Wing Shill, could be called a lot of things amuse bouche Feb 2021 #43
But, It's Not Her Name ProfessorGAC Feb 2021 #47
Don't care. Still bland amuse bouche Feb 2021 #50
How about Ms. Dumbass? Is that allowed in our narrow views? nt JanMichael Feb 2021 #60
SURE! ProfessorGAC Feb 2021 #62
But "Dumbass" isn't her surname? JanMichael Feb 2021 #63
Yeah, really, treestar Feb 2021 #59
This place gets more and more absurd amuse bouche Feb 2021 #74
I agree question everything! I don't like this woman one bit, but she has the right to be referred redstatebluegirl Feb 2021 #44
People have no right to naming protections Roy Rolling Feb 2021 #67
Thanks. elleng Feb 2021 #46
In her case, it's meant to link her to Alan Greenspan treestar Feb 2021 #58
Okay.. Andrea But her Emails Mitchell Cha Feb 2021 #64
It is. If she were a man, similarly hated, how would he have referred to him? question everything Feb 2021 #71
Like it was said above, something worse treestar Feb 2021 #73
Mister Mitchell? True Blue American Feb 2021 #76
Live free or die! CTyankee Feb 2021 #2
More like live free and die! Wounded Bear Feb 2021 #48
Yep. I was being sarcastic. CTyankee Feb 2021 #55
And safety . We need to use these type of terms more JI7 Feb 2021 #3
I like the football analogy. Deregulation is like the nfl getting rid of referees unblock Feb 2021 #4
Lines on the field, rulebooks, video review are all helpful. empedocles Feb 2021 #7
Same with cops. theneworiginal Feb 2021 #36
And many other things. gibraltar72 Feb 2021 #5
Republicans have always been for deregulating everything Cyrano Feb 2021 #6
As someone else already said here, gab13by13 Feb 2021 #8
I like the way one of the guest speakers corrected a host, (not sure who) Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #9
The greatest book on "Regulations"...yes this book created some..Upton Sinclair..."The Jungle" ,1906 Stuart G Feb 2021 #10
Excellent book. littlemissmartypants Feb 2021 #14
You mean that industry self 'regulation' didn't work?.... Say it ain't so !!!!!!! groundloop Feb 2021 #25
Right! The industries are motivated treestar Feb 2021 #79
The energy companies are taking advantage of Texas residence . .. Iliyah Feb 2021 #11
Stephanie Ruhle has become my favorite at MSNBC PufPuf23 Feb 2021 #12
Stephanie Ruhles ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #16
Smart gal who chooses her words carefully. NoMoreRepugs Feb 2021 #13
Kicked. ❤ nt littlemissmartypants Feb 2021 #15
As I point out to anyone who will listen, Arthur_Frain Feb 2021 #17
Yep. And when they say, "kills jobs" what they mean is, "I don't get as much money". Caliman73 Feb 2021 #41
To keep your cracked windshield from spreading, here's a little trick I learned... aggiesal Feb 2021 #53
I loved the Texas Judge when asked by Stephanie True Blue American Feb 2021 #18
Yes, We Do ProfessorGAC Feb 2021 #49
Haven't the Governor True Blue American Feb 2021 #56
I Heard That, Too ProfessorGAC Feb 2021 #69
So that is how they stopped it? True Blue American Feb 2021 #75
Different States With Different Rules ProfessorGAC Feb 2021 #77
Thanks! True Blue American Feb 2021 #78
The question is: are the voters of of Texas finally getting it? FakeNoose Feb 2021 #19
Yes, electricity, gas & water were once public utilities ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #21
There have been efforts to do the same thing in Pennsylvania FakeNoose Feb 2021 #26
It's funny how folks think socialism is so bad when aocommunalpunch Feb 2021 #20
Privatize the profits and socialize the debt ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #22
Whether regulations mean protections depends on what the regulations say. Klaralven Feb 2021 #23
I'm glad the subject of deregulation and privatization is the focus of attention for so many. jaxexpat Feb 2021 #24
K & R for an important subject, and a great thread from DU'ers. Permanut Feb 2021 #27
GQP wants the good old days back central scrutinizer Feb 2021 #28
old saying, letting the fox rule the henhouse . AllaN01Bear Feb 2021 #29
This is one of the most blatant examples of greed gone....what's a more powerful word than 'wild?" BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #30
Clicked "Post" instead of clicking into the text field. BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #32
I've seen $17,000 bills reported. tblue37 Feb 2021 #61
The Democratic Party is the party that protects Americans Poiuyt Feb 2021 #31
That these distinctions have to be written down and disseminated is ridiculous, IMO. BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #33
I agree, but he was speaking about marketing Poiuyt Feb 2021 #65
Regulations are like a cop on the beat Mabel Feb 2021 #34
Cops are PROTECTIONS ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #38
thanks! certainot Feb 2021 #35
And that's what we should call them. PROTECTIONS. calimary Feb 2021 #39
Exactly why I always say, substitute REGULATIONS with PROTECTIONS ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #45
K&R Blue Owl Feb 2021 #42
I see big class action lawsuits in Texas over this. flying_wahini Feb 2021 #51
Stephanie Ruhle rules! patphil Feb 2021 #52
Here is something funny ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #54
? This is not a new idea. The essence of regulation is to Hortensis Feb 2021 #57
My purpose is that we, as liberals should use the word ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #66
I endorse posts that stress semantics. Oldem Feb 2021 #68
say "regulatory safeguards" doubleplusgood Feb 2021 #70
say "Protection safeguards" ... aggiesal Feb 2021 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wow, Stephanie Ruhle on M...»Reply #73