Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)

9. Yes, I remember it well and that's why I was surprised she didn't challenge the republican

Reply to Raven123 (Reply #7)

Fri Mar 12, 2021, 10:50 AM

Mar 2021

on it. It's not about fraud itself but how you prevent and put it safeguards to find out the fraud. The fraud itself doesn't credit or discredit the bill.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why is it ok to have fraud for the PPP program but it's unacceptable for the current bill? [View all] Claustrum Mar 2021 OP

Bottom line is that there's Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #1

I completely agree with you. Claustrum Mar 2021 #2

the difference is the gop engineered fraud into ppp.... getagrip_already Mar 2021 #3

Double standard Johnny2X2X Mar 2021 #4

I believe the PPP had a "better class" of fraudsters. JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2021 #5

They are going to try to discredit the bill anyway they can. Even if they have to resort to Irish_Dem Mar 2021 #6

I remember Stephanie Ruhle asking about accountability when the PPP was passed. Raven123 Mar 2021 #7

Yes, I remember it well and that's why I was surprised she didn't challenge the republican Claustrum Mar 2021 #9

"Fraud" is a dog whistle. It means brown people stealing white mens money underpants Mar 2021 #8

Why must they always go with false equivalencies taxi Mar 2021 #10

I don't think they made a false equivalencies in this case. I was the one that brought in Claustrum Mar 2021 #11

My mistake. Should have stated that it was their coverage that allows fallacies to start taxi Mar 2021 #12