Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SixthSense

(829 posts)

3. if "win" is defined as gaining more than you lose

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:33 AM

Jan 2012

then I don't think there is any "win" possible in any military scenario against Iran

even if we can best them militarily, the combined consequences of doing so would be worse than anything we could gain out of it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Way Can US Win A Non-Nuclear War With Iran [View all] SixthSense Jan 2012 OP

an iran war is designed to sell lots of weapons and give $$ to war profiteers nt msongs Jan 2012 #1

Depends what the objectives are ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #2

if "win" is defined as gaining more than you lose SixthSense Jan 2012 #3

Goes back to your objectives ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #4

Keeping open the Straits of Hormuz is the most important thing... damyank913 Jan 2012 #7

Here's a better option... Moostache Jan 2012 #5

Mullen was not implying a nuclear attack on Iran. DCBob Jan 2012 #6

Sure we can...it will be a cakewalk, as someone once said deutsey Jan 2012 #8

Of coure it's true. Of course (as you point out) there is no "winning" JackRiddler Jan 2012 #9

From the folks who predict the end of the world, 12/21/12 ... pinto Jan 2012 #10

Considering the source, I'm going to lock this as "Creative Speculation". gkhouston Jan 2012 #11