HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » MIT Technology Review: No... » Reply #34

Response to jcgoldie (Reply #33)

Sat Mar 27, 2021, 09:44 PM

34. Not an accurate representation

and I am not in the least bit embarrassed, for myself, anyway.

The articles I've posted mostly *all* describe why the "scientific evidence" is not conclusive, but people who fail to understand the nuance in the literature don't understand. I frankly understand it much, much better than most here, which really compounds the frustration.

When you can talk to me intelligently about the furin cleavage site, Genbank sequence entries, missing databases, the Mojiang mine incident, etc, then we can have a real conversation--but that isn't what many here want.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 35 replies Author Time Post
intrepidity Mar 27 OP
MustLoveBeagles Mar 27 #1
niyad Mar 27 #2
womanofthehills Mar 27 #3
Journeyman Mar 27 #4
Phoenix61 Mar 27 #5
intrepidity Mar 27 #6
Phoenix61 Mar 27 #7
torius Mar 27 #9
intrepidity Mar 27 #17
Initech Mar 27 #8
torius Mar 27 #10
roamer65 Mar 27 #12
intrepidity Mar 27 #13
torius Mar 27 #19
intrepidity Mar 27 #25
Celerity Mar 27 #27
intrepidity Mar 27 #32
roamer65 Mar 27 #11
intrepidity Mar 27 #14
roamer65 Mar 27 #15
intrepidity Mar 27 #18
torius Mar 27 #21
roamer65 Mar 27 #23
roamer65 Mar 27 #24
intrepidity Mar 27 #26
torius Mar 27 #22
jcgoldie Mar 27 #16
intrepidity Mar 27 #20
jcgoldie Mar 27 #29
intrepidity Mar 27 #31
jcgoldie Mar 27 #33
LineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Not an accurate representation
intrepidity Mar 27 #34
struggle4progress Mar 27 #28
intrepidity Mar 27 #30
Klaralven Mar 27 #35
Please login to view edit histories.