General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel is really slamming the DOJ under Merrick Garland, everything from not doing anything [View all]Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)The concerns she expressed about the DOJ under Garland are not, "Why doesn't he fix everything yesterday???!!!"
I'm not going to argue the specific the issues she raised, but this line of criticism against her for raising them is somewhat simplistic and immature in its own way. And these sarcastic & condescending replies to DUers who believe Maddow's criticism of Garland have merit are, as well.
Progressives/Liberals are being told we're responsible for not having been angry enough or fought hard enough about loads of issues in the past. Yet we're also to be scolded for being too angry about what many who know more than the average person about politics say is something to be concerned about.
Maybe we'd better we step away from having any opinions or taking any actions, including voting, until we all all get our poli sci & law degrees.