General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We see regular, often harsh criticism of the media for their decisions on what and who to cover [View all]Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)At that moment in time, your link details -exactly- what I was feeling. I own it, I respect it, and I cherish that response; Not necessarily for the message it conveys, but I embrace it as a part of myself as much as I embrace my anger or fear or sadness. You can link all you want in an effort to 'shame' me, but I feel none and never will. If I could put it as my signature without fear of being alerted nonstop for 'inappropriate signature', I would do so just to prove a point.
You consistently post both the link and the same three-word response to posts I make, but the blunt of it is, I don't care and never will. My experience, feelings and response are just as valid as your own, and your attempt to... do whatever it is you're doing when you scuttle along, reposting the same thing as if it matters... means nothing to me. It never will, because I know what I said and will say it again if the situation is ever the same.
Betsuni, the simple fact is, that little blue link, or anything you may infer from it, means less than nothing to me; it's a nonissue, not worth my time or effort. Something said years ago, but I felt it and I meant it, so I will never disown it.
I've no doubt this will be hidden, as I'm sure "Someone" is looking to bait me into an alert, but I need you to understand just how little this matters. Nothing said or done here will change what I've said in the past, and it won't change what I say in the future. You at the very least deserve the explanation I'm so graciously offering you, since you insist on trying to refight the primaries on any post of mine you happen to see.
Let me know if you need someone matching your proclivities regarding the masonry fetish. I know someone who can hook you up. I'm not that into it, but kinkshaming is for prudes and Republicans, and I'm neither.