Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

Kid Berwyn

(14,863 posts)
5. When they don't vote to support Democratic policies, there's a problem. The data show...
Sun Oct 31, 2021, 10:19 AM
Oct 2021
Sinema and Manchin Flush With Lobbyist Contributions as They Hold Up Biden Agenda

By Matthias Rémy Lalisse
Data for Progress, Oct. 28, 2019

Amid ongoing Build Back Better negotiations, lobbyists have stepped up their contributions to Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, the sole Democratic holdouts against advancing the Biden agenda through the Senate.

Manchin and Sinema are the 2018 Senate class’s top recipients of contributions from lobbyists. In the first half of 2021, Sinema (first elected to the Senate in 2018) received $408,000 in contributions from lobbyists, 150% of what she received at the same time last year despite not being up for re-election until 2024. Manchin (re-elected in 2018) received $512,000 from lobbyists, nearly three times as much as last year. Together, the two top the list of their Senate cohort—both Democrats and Republicans—in donations from lobbyists, which include direct campaign contributions from lobbyist and/or lobbyist-controlled PACs, costs of lobbyists attending/organizing fundraisers, or sponsorship of events promoting Manchin or Sinema.

To place these quantities in perspective, the typical six-year electoral cycle means that Senate candidates receive the highest volume of lobbyist contributions in the year or two running up to their elections, followed by a trough until the next cycle. Manchin’s 2021 contributions are now at the same level as his election year, and Sinema has received a steady stream of lobbyist money into her coffers since taking office. Both are taking in lobbyist contributions at more than three times the rate of the average Senator.

The data presented provides real-time evidence that Sinema and Manchin’s obstruction of the Biden agenda is being rewarded by lobbyists seeking to influence their legislative priorities. In this case, those priorities are to smother provisions like negotiated pharmaceutical pricing through Medicare and a just transition to renewable energy, measures that directly target the interests of Big Pharma and Big Oil. This comes as new DFP polling shows Sinema at a severe disadvantage for a potential primary challenger in 2024.

Sold to Arizona voters in 2018 as a former Green Party activist with a working-class personal history, Sinema has acquired a new reputation for cozying up to donors lobbyists. But in reality, Sinema’s Senate campaign was always powered by big donors. According to FEC filings, only 16% of the summed direct contributions to Sinema’s campaign PAC came from donations of less than $500. In 2021, that amount has dropped to 7.5%. Manchin’s campaign contributions are even more dominated by large donors, with only 1.6% of 2021 receipts coming from small contributions.

As Sinema and Manchin continue to obstruct the Biden agenda, we cannot ignore the influence that lobbyist contributions are having on their votes. Such obstruction of highly popular policies is likely to impact their electoral prospects in 2024 and beyond.

Methods

Under the 1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act, lobbyists are required to register as such and to report any contributions to political officeholders/candidates, including personal donations, purchase of tickets to fundraisers, and contributions made from lobbyist-controlled PACs. Data were extracted from the publicly Form LD-203 filings, which require lobbyists to report a series of contribution types including personal contributions to the candidates, ones routed through PACs that the lobbyist founded or controls, as well as any spending on events honoring a legislator. Using the LDA API, we pulled all Form 203 filings from 2015-2021, eliminated duplicates/amendments, and extracted contributions aimed at each Senator using string matches mapped to a database of legislators. If the last name was unique among all legislators (e.g. Feinstein, Tester, Sinema, Manchin), we matched the last name. When there were duplicate last names (e.g. Sen. Sherrod Brown, Reps. Corinne Brown and Anthony Brown), we matched to all versions of the Senators’ names as they can appear in the disclosures ("Sherrod Brown", "Brown, Sherrod" ).

Matthias Lalisse (@MatthiasLalisse) is a data scientist, organizer, and recent PhD grad in Computational Cognitive Science from Johns Hopkins University.
OCTOBER 27, 2021

Source: https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2021/10/27/sinema-and-manchin-flush-with-lobbyist-contributions
Post removed [View all] Post removed Oct 2021 OP
Perhaps you have some context for this, along with some names. MineralMan Oct 2021 #1
Think about it... their names will come to you in a jiffy. secondwind Oct 2021 #3
Here is a hint: S and M. olegramps Oct 2021 #23
Sure seems that way. Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #2
Mine too. lark Oct 2021 #4
When they don't vote to support Democratic policies, there's a problem. The data show... Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #5
They will keep moving the goal post until their ultra-wealthy benefactors are satisfied. olegramps Oct 2021 #22
Sinema and Manchin have voted with the Biden Administration 100% of the time... brooklynite Oct 2021 #6
Absolutely correct...but massive hyperbole is required if unsupported smearing is the goal. Alexander Of Assyria Oct 2021 #8
When they prevent an agreement to be brought CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #9
Manchin and Sinema have voted FOR one of the two components... brooklynite Oct 2021 #10
I missed the part where we were talking CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #12
They haven't AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #13
Exactly. Thank you. nt DLevine Oct 2021 #11
Clearly their is or needs to be a caveat on that claim. Or we wouldn't be discussing this. CentralMass Oct 2021 #14
Easy to vote "100%" of the time when you won't let bills you don't like come to a vote. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2021 #21
If -I- wanted to destroy the Biden Presidency, I'd probably start by voting for McConnell as Maj Ldr brooklynite Oct 2021 #7
You never seem to place any blame with the two Senators in the party thwarting CentralMass Oct 2021 #16
I don't place blame with anybody... brooklynite Oct 2021 #18
Yet it is effectively 48 + the President vs 2 on this critical bill.. CentralMass Oct 2021 #19
I know, it really does look that way for SineManch. ananda Oct 2021 #15
Umm. Stein's 2016 staffers literally ran Sander's 2020 campaign Budi Oct 2021 #17
Man, I've got my chin in my hands pondering who you might mean. 11 Bravo Oct 2021 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #5