Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #11
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Post removed [View all] Post removed Oct 2021 OP
Perhaps you have some context for this, along with some names. MineralMan Oct 2021 #1
Think about it... their names will come to you in a jiffy. secondwind Oct 2021 #3
Here is a hint: S and M. olegramps Oct 2021 #23
Sure seems that way. Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #2
Mine too. lark Oct 2021 #4
When they don't vote to support Democratic policies, there's a problem. The data show... Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #5
They will keep moving the goal post until their ultra-wealthy benefactors are satisfied. olegramps Oct 2021 #22
Sinema and Manchin have voted with the Biden Administration 100% of the time... brooklynite Oct 2021 #6
Absolutely correct...but massive hyperbole is required if unsupported smearing is the goal. Alexander Of Assyria Oct 2021 #8
When they prevent an agreement to be brought CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #9
Manchin and Sinema have voted FOR one of the two components... brooklynite Oct 2021 #10
I missed the part where we were talking CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #12
They haven't AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #13
Exactly. Thank you. nt DLevine Oct 2021 #11
Clearly their is or needs to be a caveat on that claim. Or we wouldn't be discussing this. CentralMass Oct 2021 #14
Easy to vote "100%" of the time when you won't let bills you don't like come to a vote. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2021 #21
If -I- wanted to destroy the Biden Presidency, I'd probably start by voting for McConnell as Maj Ldr brooklynite Oct 2021 #7
You never seem to place any blame with the two Senators in the party thwarting CentralMass Oct 2021 #16
I don't place blame with anybody... brooklynite Oct 2021 #18
Yet it is effectively 48 + the President vs 2 on this critical bill.. CentralMass Oct 2021 #19
I know, it really does look that way for SineManch. ananda Oct 2021 #15
Umm. Stein's 2016 staffers literally ran Sander's 2020 campaign Budi Oct 2021 #17
Man, I've got my chin in my hands pondering who you might mean. 11 Bravo Oct 2021 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #11
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.