Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(9,028 posts)
27. It's certainly been useful for school
Wed Nov 10, 2021, 04:33 PM
Nov 2021

Was talking with my social psychology professor after class yesterday. This semester, we've been spending a lot of time on the polarization in the country, why it's happening, how identity is supplanting traditional forms of tribalism with the rise of social media. People believing narratives over facts has been a bugaboo of mine for ages, so I've just been mining the deep, rich veins of all this for class material.

I'm an AOC style progressive, and my professor is pretty much a hippie, and we were both talking about how absolutely insane the disconnect between the facts and the narrative has been in all of this.

How this story has been portrayed in the mainstream and social media and what we're seeing at the actual trial almost have no relation to each other.

For what? Some of us are at work and can't hear or watch. Maru Kitteh Nov 2021 #1
The prosecution managed two massive violations Sympthsical Nov 2021 #2
Ultimately Effete Snob Nov 2021 #4
I don't see how it isn't an acquittal Sympthsical Nov 2021 #5
That has nothing to to do with this motion Effete Snob Nov 2021 #11
I meant that the trial itself goes to the jury Sympthsical Nov 2021 #14
I have not seen much of this trial because I turned it off in utter disgust---with the judge! Atticus Nov 2021 #16
I've been watching it live Sympthsical Nov 2021 #17
As I said, I did see what is now apparently a "blatant" violation of defendant's 5th and even Atticus Nov 2021 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Atticus Nov 2021 #21
It's on the judge. He started out saying bs against the media for calling him out rockfordfile Nov 2021 #29
I have yet to see any legal commenter disagreeing with the 5th Amendment thing Sympthsical Nov 2021 #31
For anything Effete Snob Nov 2021 #3
Question for those who have actually been watching the trial.....Do you think walkingman Nov 2021 #6
Does a bear shit in the forest? Scottie Mom Nov 2021 #8
I think he meets the legal standard of self-defense Sympthsical Nov 2021 #9
Is that his defense? leftstreet Nov 2021 #18
the prosecutor's Chille Nov 2021 #23
I think this was way over-charged Sympthsical Nov 2021 #25
Thanks leftstreet Nov 2021 #26
He is still testifying. Kingofalldems Nov 2021 #28
Let's call it a preponderance of available evidence Sympthsical Nov 2021 #30
Victims. those people he shot were victims. rockfordfile Nov 2021 #32
I can't recall Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #7
He'll get away with it. No one questions that he was the one who shot Hav Nov 2021 #22
He still wouldn't know Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #33
Good to hear from the Biggest Fan greenjar_01 Nov 2021 #10
I apologize for trying to be objective about the trial Sympthsical Nov 2021 #12
ROFL greenjar_01 Nov 2021 #13
Whatever happened to ROFLcopter? Sympthsical Nov 2021 #15
Funnily enough... Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #19
It's certainly been useful for school Sympthsical Nov 2021 #27
the news media Chille Nov 2021 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rittenhouse defense a...»Reply #27