Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Rittenhouse Judge screwed up! [View all] Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 OP
Want to do some about the Judge in the Rittenhouse trial, file a complaint. LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #1
Can we all file for a 10k bounty? Captain Zero Nov 2021 #20
Also not a woman. n/t MuseRider Nov 2021 #52
He's demonstrated pretty clearly that he certainly is a "piece o' work". calimary Nov 2021 #38
I have watched some of it and the judge seems out of control. Not calm and reasonable. olegramps Nov 2021 #70
He's going for a mistrial so that piece of shit can WALK free and live his best, murderous life. LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #2
Only a mistrial "with prejudice" would allow him to walk. Cattledog Nov 2021 #5
Exactly SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #9
Fingers crossed RayStar Nov 2021 #61
And if the judge declares it to be "with prejudice" as threatened... NullTuples Nov 2021 #14
Ironic, when it's the judge bringing the prejudice in Bucky Nov 2021 #37
I haven't even bothered to watch the trial, but from what I've read/heard ... LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #30
But, this would be the judge to do it. LogicFirst Nov 2021 #79
Exactly!! Wouldn't mind seeing the judge being put on trial after Rittenhouse is convicted. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2021 #8
What? He's an elected state judge. How can congress do anything? jimfields33 Nov 2021 #19
For some reason I feel his life is going to be hell after the trial Tribetime Nov 2021 #28
I agree. His behavior has been reinforced Ritabert Nov 2021 #41
Yep Tribetime Nov 2021 #46
Why can't the feds try him for crossing state lines to commit a felony? marie999 Nov 2021 #33
Per testimony.....The "cool" firearm Kyle owned never left the state of WI Heartstrings Nov 2021 #71
I want his mother on trial. Oppaloopa Nov 2021 #73
For what exactly? (n/t) Hav Nov 2021 #75
he can be tried again barbtries Nov 2021 #68
Not sure where you got that idea FBaggins Nov 2021 #3
+1. No basis at all. stopdiggin Nov 2021 #6
OP is a bit exaggerated SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #10
OP is a lot exaggerated. onenote Nov 2021 #11
We stopped the "so help me god" Mr.Bill Nov 2021 #31
Federal courts said it couldn't be required years ago SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #35
Between 1994 & 2013.... ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #53
Or they can just say "I affrim" Oppaloopa Nov 2021 #74
They may have in the past.... BUT Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #16
In the past AND currently FBaggins Nov 2021 #26
I cited the law Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #39
You really didn't FBaggins Nov 2021 #43
Let's put into another example! Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #77
That is a garbage excuse. Freedom of speech and religion doesn't proscribe Calista241 Nov 2021 #44
Admitting you are wrong, is also an option...you know? tritsofme Nov 2021 #49
nope. there is no infraction stopdiggin Nov 2021 #64
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #32
Jews generally dont get pissed at such semantics. oldsoftie Nov 2021 #42
The Courts *Should be* The Separation point of "Church and State" msfiddlestix Nov 2021 #58
Exactly! Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #60
The Bill of Rights has never been stopdiggin Nov 2021 #65
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #80
He wasn't proselytizing Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
Thanks for your clarifying reply here! nt abqtommy Nov 2021 #7
We might need a couple of good lawyers to clarify that. Autumn Nov 2021 #22
Yes, thanks for clarifying that, was wondering what the uproar was about KS Toronado Nov 2021 #72
Article: sl8 Nov 2021 #12
Thank you orangecrush Nov 2021 #13
You'd be very surprised at the kind of people who defend him! spudspud Nov 2021 #54
Yup. orangecrush Nov 2021 #55
Wow UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #15
What? ShazzieB Nov 2021 #21
Looks like you don't get more than those deliberately vague insinuations Hav Nov 2021 #27
Exactly. I want the little prick jailed for murder, and I want him to do max time, but ... 11 Bravo Nov 2021 #29
There are fewer and fewer like you as time goes by oldsoftie Nov 2021 #45
Perhaps it's exacerbated as a function of my being an old codger ... 11 Bravo Nov 2021 #50
That's one interpretation UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #34
If I'm wrong, you could correct the record Hav Nov 2021 #56
I sure could correct you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #57
This judge is a disgrace. Snackshack Nov 2021 #17
What I didn't catch til now... NullTuples Nov 2021 #18
You're imagining a distinction that isn't there FBaggins Nov 2021 #40
There are at least two non-Catholic churches in Oakland called St. Paul's wryter2000 Nov 2021 #48
All of the liturgical churches have saints FBaggins Nov 2021 #51
Wow! JustADumbFireman Nov 2021 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #23
While that may be your opinion ... left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #24
Letter usaf-vet Nov 2021 #25
Can you show me a reference link for this? ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #36
Kyle Rittenhouse's Judge Explains Hearsay Rule to Jury by Talking About Trials of St. Paul billh58 Nov 2021 #62
Interesting, I somehow missed that before. ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #67
He needs a mental status exam wryter2000 Nov 2021 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #59
I can see citing a bible passage in court if it is evidence. soldierant Nov 2021 #63
The Manafort trial judge in federal court in Virginia, seemed to lean empedocles Nov 2021 #69
As someone else stated, Piece of work....n/t Upthevibe Nov 2021 #76
Filing bar complaints may be the most effective dlk Nov 2021 #78
Presidents and other government officials swear an oath on the bible manicdem Nov 2021 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rittenhouse Judge screwed...»Reply #68