Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Heartstrings

(7,349 posts)
71. Per testimony.....The "cool" firearm Kyle owned never left the state of WI
Sun Nov 14, 2021, 10:24 AM
Nov 2021

It was bought for Kyle up in Ladysmith, WI by his “friend” Dominick Black, paid for by Rittenhouse. The firearm was kept in a gun safe at Dominick Blacks father house in Kenosha. Rittenhouse chose the long gun because he knew he couldn’t legally own a handgun and the gun looked “cool”. Whether he could legally own the long gun is still subject to debate. He picked up the firearm at the Black residence that night, after driving himself from Antioch, IL (I have heard he didn’t have a drivers license but cannot verify that).

Dominick Black is facing years in prison for his admitted part in the straw man firearm purchase. Would be a travesty of justice if Rittenhouse gets off, but his “friend” Black has to serve time.

A quick google search of Bruce Schroeder yields this info:

“Schroeder attended Marquette University for college and law school, receiving a bachelor's degree in 1967 and a J.D. in 1970. In 1971, he joined the Kenosha County District Attorney's Office as an assistant district attorney. He became a district attorney in 1972. In 1983, he was appointed to the Kenosha County Circuit Court.”

This judge has been on the bench since 1983 and has shown so many reasons why he needs to retire. His cellphone going off at crucial times is just one example. Quoting Bible passages, past cases he tried but can’t remember details, laughing inappropriately, going off on the prosecutor, asking how the temperature is in the room during crucial testimony…..just a few examples.

He’s an asshole and an embarrassment to my state.

Rittenhouse Judge screwed up! [View all] Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 OP
Want to do some about the Judge in the Rittenhouse trial, file a complaint. LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #1
Can we all file for a 10k bounty? Captain Zero Nov 2021 #20
Also not a woman. n/t MuseRider Nov 2021 #52
He's demonstrated pretty clearly that he certainly is a "piece o' work". calimary Nov 2021 #38
I have watched some of it and the judge seems out of control. Not calm and reasonable. olegramps Nov 2021 #70
He's going for a mistrial so that piece of shit can WALK free and live his best, murderous life. LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #2
Only a mistrial "with prejudice" would allow him to walk. Cattledog Nov 2021 #5
Exactly SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #9
Fingers crossed RayStar Nov 2021 #61
And if the judge declares it to be "with prejudice" as threatened... NullTuples Nov 2021 #14
Ironic, when it's the judge bringing the prejudice in Bucky Nov 2021 #37
I haven't even bothered to watch the trial, but from what I've read/heard ... LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #30
But, this would be the judge to do it. LogicFirst Nov 2021 #79
Exactly!! Wouldn't mind seeing the judge being put on trial after Rittenhouse is convicted. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2021 #8
What? He's an elected state judge. How can congress do anything? jimfields33 Nov 2021 #19
For some reason I feel his life is going to be hell after the trial Tribetime Nov 2021 #28
I agree. His behavior has been reinforced Ritabert Nov 2021 #41
Yep Tribetime Nov 2021 #46
Why can't the feds try him for crossing state lines to commit a felony? marie999 Nov 2021 #33
Per testimony.....The "cool" firearm Kyle owned never left the state of WI Heartstrings Nov 2021 #71
I want his mother on trial. Oppaloopa Nov 2021 #73
For what exactly? (n/t) Hav Nov 2021 #75
he can be tried again barbtries Nov 2021 #68
Not sure where you got that idea FBaggins Nov 2021 #3
+1. No basis at all. stopdiggin Nov 2021 #6
OP is a bit exaggerated SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #10
OP is a lot exaggerated. onenote Nov 2021 #11
We stopped the "so help me god" Mr.Bill Nov 2021 #31
Federal courts said it couldn't be required years ago SCantiGOP Nov 2021 #35
Between 1994 & 2013.... ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #53
Or they can just say "I affrim" Oppaloopa Nov 2021 #74
They may have in the past.... BUT Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #16
In the past AND currently FBaggins Nov 2021 #26
I cited the law Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #39
You really didn't FBaggins Nov 2021 #43
Let's put into another example! Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #77
That is a garbage excuse. Freedom of speech and religion doesn't proscribe Calista241 Nov 2021 #44
Admitting you are wrong, is also an option...you know? tritsofme Nov 2021 #49
nope. there is no infraction stopdiggin Nov 2021 #64
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #32
Jews generally dont get pissed at such semantics. oldsoftie Nov 2021 #42
The Courts *Should be* The Separation point of "Church and State" msfiddlestix Nov 2021 #58
Exactly! Smackdown2019 Nov 2021 #60
The Bill of Rights has never been stopdiggin Nov 2021 #65
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Nov 2021 #80
He wasn't proselytizing Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
Thanks for your clarifying reply here! nt abqtommy Nov 2021 #7
We might need a couple of good lawyers to clarify that. Autumn Nov 2021 #22
Yes, thanks for clarifying that, was wondering what the uproar was about KS Toronado Nov 2021 #72
Article: sl8 Nov 2021 #12
Thank you orangecrush Nov 2021 #13
You'd be very surprised at the kind of people who defend him! spudspud Nov 2021 #54
Yup. orangecrush Nov 2021 #55
Wow UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #15
What? ShazzieB Nov 2021 #21
Looks like you don't get more than those deliberately vague insinuations Hav Nov 2021 #27
Exactly. I want the little prick jailed for murder, and I want him to do max time, but ... 11 Bravo Nov 2021 #29
There are fewer and fewer like you as time goes by oldsoftie Nov 2021 #45
Perhaps it's exacerbated as a function of my being an old codger ... 11 Bravo Nov 2021 #50
That's one interpretation UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #34
If I'm wrong, you could correct the record Hav Nov 2021 #56
I sure could correct you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #57
This judge is a disgrace. Snackshack Nov 2021 #17
What I didn't catch til now... NullTuples Nov 2021 #18
You're imagining a distinction that isn't there FBaggins Nov 2021 #40
There are at least two non-Catholic churches in Oakland called St. Paul's wryter2000 Nov 2021 #48
All of the liturgical churches have saints FBaggins Nov 2021 #51
Wow! JustADumbFireman Nov 2021 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #23
While that may be your opinion ... left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #24
Letter usaf-vet Nov 2021 #25
Can you show me a reference link for this? ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #36
Kyle Rittenhouse's Judge Explains Hearsay Rule to Jury by Talking About Trials of St. Paul billh58 Nov 2021 #62
Interesting, I somehow missed that before. ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #67
He needs a mental status exam wryter2000 Nov 2021 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author left-of-center2012 Nov 2021 #59
I can see citing a bible passage in court if it is evidence. soldierant Nov 2021 #63
The Manafort trial judge in federal court in Virginia, seemed to lean empedocles Nov 2021 #69
As someone else stated, Piece of work....n/t Upthevibe Nov 2021 #76
Filing bar complaints may be the most effective dlk Nov 2021 #78
Presidents and other government officials swear an oath on the bible manicdem Nov 2021 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rittenhouse Judge screwed...»Reply #71