Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gaugamela

(2,811 posts)
5. There is this: The Guarantee Clause
Tue Dec 28, 2021, 05:59 PM
Dec 2021

I wouldn’t hold my breath, but it’s a possibility. They’d have to get past the filibuster to act.

The Guarantee Clause, also known as the Republican Form of Government Clause, is in Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution, and requires the United States to guarantee every State a Republican form of government and provide protection from foreign invasion and domestic violence.

Article IV, Section 4:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Cases such as Luther v. Borden held the Guarantee Clause to be a political question to be resolved by Congress. Relying on that understanding, the Reconstruction era Congress disestablished ten state governments during peacetime and placed them under military rule. The law, known as the First Reconstruction Act, found those states to be unrepublican under the Guarantee Clause.[4][5] The Supreme Court acquiesced to the disestablishment in Georgia v. Stanton (1868).[6] Later, Congress also excluded elected legislators (a power recognized in Luther) when it faced "an election dispute created by state measures to suppress black voter turnout."[6]




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarantee_Clause

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The question is, what wou...»Reply #5