Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former clerk rewrites SCO...»Reply #13
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Former clerk rewrites SCOTUS contenders' Wikipedia bios [View all]

MichMan

(11,858 posts)
13. The perpetrator is currently a lawyer for a DC law firm
Reply to yardwork (Reply #11)
Sat Feb 5, 2022, 03:47 PM
Feb 2022

Not only did he highlight or downplay entries in the page of his former boss, he also altered the pages of other top contenders to make them look worse. I don't think that is something that should be just ignored.

Do you think trying to interfere with the nomination process for potential SC Justices warrants being disbarred?

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Former clerk rewrites SCOTUS contenders' Wikipedia bios [View all] MichMan Feb 2022 OP
DINO. Karadeniz Feb 2022 #1
Not helpful. Sneederbunk Feb 2022 #2
jeeze.. really? what a way to disqualify even if she wasn't aware msfiddlestix Feb 2022 #3
Wikipedia is open source. Anybody can become an editor and alter pages. yardwork Feb 2022 #4
No legal consequences for malicious altering ? MichMan Feb 2022 #6
None whatsoever unless somebody won a libel case. yardwork Feb 2022 #7
Hope you're correct on last point msfiddlestix Feb 2022 #14
Anyone who isn't selected should sue him and he should also be disbarred MichMan Feb 2022 #5
Honestly, I doubt the Senate considers Wiki pages as part of the review. yardwork Feb 2022 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Feb 2022 #10
What was slanderous about the alterations? yardwork Feb 2022 #11
The perpetrator is currently a lawyer for a DC law firm MichMan Feb 2022 #13
An ultimate "You know we can see you, right?" Sympthsical Feb 2022 #9
I know, right? yardwork Feb 2022 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former clerk rewrites SCO...»Reply #13
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.