Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,153 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 12:22 PM Oct 2012

The ironic thing about the Electoral College. [View all]

It is arguably the one thing that can be claimed to be both constitutional and unconstitutional, all at the same time.

It is constitutional in that it is mandated by the U.S. Constitution.

It is unconstitutional in that it arguably violates the equal protection clause. For example, I live in Florida, the fourth most populous state in the country. My state gets 29 electoral votes. Wyoming is the least populous state in the country. It gets 3 electoral votes. I vote. Someone from Wyoming votes. In fact, two people have voted. However, given the electoral situation in both states, my vote is given more weight than someone in Wyoming. So in essence, my vote "counts" more and this would violate the equal protection clause but for the fact that the electoral college is already written into the constitution.

Even though I'm the benefactor in this situation, I still find this to be rather unfair.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The ironic thing about th...