Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

keithbvadu2

(36,640 posts)

4. When arguing the Constitution on social media:

Reply to albacore (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2022, 08:07 PM

May 2022

When arguing the Constitution on social media:

1. Whatever is not specifically allowed must be forbidden. IF this logic supports your premise.

2. Whatever is not specifically forbidden must be allowed. IF this logic supports your premise.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anti-abortion zealots... including Alito... point out that nowhere in the Constitution ... [View all] albacore May 2022 OP

No respectable law review would publish no_hypocrisy May 2022 #1

9th amendment takes care of omitted rights. Karadeniz May 2022 #2

I understand that Alito did not mention the Ninth Amendment at all gratuitous May 2022 #3

When arguing the Constitution on social media: keithbvadu2 May 2022 #4

the 9th amendment was written specifically to prevent rulings like this being used Takket May 2022 #5

maybe only MUSKETS ARE allowed by this reasoning as well. pansypoo53219 May 2022 #6

single bullet magazines only Captain Zero May 2022 #7