Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(14,782 posts)
4. J6 Comm has neither the authority nor the responsibility to prosecute anyone. That's the DOJ.
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 09:30 PM
Jun 2022

Cable "news" is a cesspool of noxious nonsense. Watching it poisons one's brain.

No. DOJ will have failed. Sneederbunk Jun 2022 #1
Yes. If there are legit crimes. YES. If none... Another story Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2022 #2
Really? Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2022 #19
Congress is a legislative body. wnylib Jun 2022 #24
Of course! Was a lane attempt at sarcasm. You and I are Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #56
STUPID panelist, elleng Jun 2022 #3
Think operative words are "result in"??! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #5
Still is DOJ's responsibility. wnylib Jun 2022 #26
J6 Comm has neither the authority nor the responsibility to prosecute anyone. That's the DOJ. RockRaven Jun 2022 #4
Think he was saying/implying ultimately Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #6
Does not matter what he might have implied. wnylib Jun 2022 #27
Huh... Happen to think he was spot on. You are thinking Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #28
He was not "spot on." He was displaying either ignorance of wnylib Jun 2022 #36
Yes! Legal definition ok. But here we are talking only about Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #43
1/6 rso Jun 2022 #7
Ugh. So you are saying it doesn't matter? We have to settle for just the truth coming out Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #32
They can't prosecute anyone. Even though they have well proven all elements of many crimes already. onecaliberal Jun 2022 #8
So WTF Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #13
DOJ 🤷‍♀️ onecaliberal Jun 2022 #17
IMO, if they result in opening enough peoples' eyes to vote for Dems... dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #11
Ya. If you boil it down ALL that's important .. swaying some voters ! nt Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #16
I think the DOJ is filled with competent lawyers who will prosecute if they can link the act In It to Win It Jun 2022 #12
Yes! GA! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #33
Gotta love how the right wing frames everything. unblock Jun 2022 #14
+100,000 wnylib Jun 2022 #29
Most of the media is owned by the same investors that "own" most of the GOP. PufPuf23 Jun 2022 #34
I am a Dem for generations . In my DNA. Just asking Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #44
Huh?? Ok. So guess from the Democratic pov, it does not Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #35
my point is that the focus should be on the horrible things we're all seeing that republicans did unblock Jun 2022 #47
Think you could be? reading WAY too much into this? Bottom line. Does the right Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #51
Biggest mystery... Why aren't we on tV three times a day Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #58
No mystery. The media is always most interested in pushing right wing frames unblock Jun 2022 #59
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2022 #60
No Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #15
If you can't get the Justice department to act with this overwhelming evidence.... BlueTsunami2018 Jun 2022 #18
If I could agree more than 100% I would ! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #45
Yet good will eventually outweigh bad. At least that's Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #55
+1, the fake Trump electors are low hanging fruit!!!! uponit7771 Jun 2022 #61
Who was the panelist? greatauntoftriplets Jun 2022 #20
What does your family member mean be "due justice?" rsdsharp Jun 2022 #21
Yes! Think they meant " due process". They kept harkening Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #37
I don't expect there to be a major prosecution, but I think these hearings are very Poiuyt Jun 2022 #22
It all depends on who writes the history. If they are not prosecuted there will doc03 Jun 2022 #42
No. The J6 committee and the DoJ have different functions. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #23
Thanks. That was much better than wnylib Jun 2022 #31
Totally clear to us... May not be to THEM Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #39
I agree that the CNN panelist does not understand the constitution and might be a secret MAGA!! NT texasfiddler Jun 2022 #25
+++ JohnSJ Jun 2022 #30
It was a pure political remark Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #41
Laura, the best answer to give, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #38
Agree 100%. Actually just think the fact that there Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #40
Actually, we have to get used to the fact that truth Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #46
Based on the comments here MyMission Jun 2022 #48
Do think it interesting.... Good ploy to try, but then assume Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #54
I'm hopeful it will sway a few votes here and there MyMission Jun 2022 #57
no prosecution - not the committee failed, the *WHOLE GOVERNMENT* UTUSN Jun 2022 #49
Yes.. Hearings of a House select committee just a piece. If a human beingca Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #53
Merrick Garland will have failed. Many thought he would be remembered for being helpisontheway Jun 2022 #50
Exactly! Why was he selected? If I was in charge of something, I would Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #52
How do you know he didn't? BlueTsunami2018 Jun 2022 #62
Wow, that CNN panelist is trying to cause outrage at Emile Jun 2022 #63
Not a failure HAB911 Jun 2022 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just heard CNN panelist s...»Reply #4