Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
54. Do think it interesting.... Good ploy to try, but then assume
Tue Jun 21, 2022, 12:56 AM
Jun 2022

a bystander role. Only option, really. And it accomplished a goal of creating an atmosphere for declaring it "partisan" .

Yet thinking people will watch and say "what the what" is a pipe dream. But hell, if they were thinking people they would have come over by now.

Answers the question. We will not sway minds. .. but will record this ultimate tragedy for history

No. DOJ will have failed. Sneederbunk Jun 2022 #1
Yes. If there are legit crimes. YES. If none... Another story Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2022 #2
Really? Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2022 #19
Congress is a legislative body. wnylib Jun 2022 #24
Of course! Was a lane attempt at sarcasm. You and I are Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #56
STUPID panelist, elleng Jun 2022 #3
Think operative words are "result in"??! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #5
Still is DOJ's responsibility. wnylib Jun 2022 #26
J6 Comm has neither the authority nor the responsibility to prosecute anyone. That's the DOJ. RockRaven Jun 2022 #4
Think he was saying/implying ultimately Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #6
Does not matter what he might have implied. wnylib Jun 2022 #27
Huh... Happen to think he was spot on. You are thinking Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #28
He was not "spot on." He was displaying either ignorance of wnylib Jun 2022 #36
Yes! Legal definition ok. But here we are talking only about Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #43
1/6 rso Jun 2022 #7
Ugh. So you are saying it doesn't matter? We have to settle for just the truth coming out Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #32
They can't prosecute anyone. Even though they have well proven all elements of many crimes already. onecaliberal Jun 2022 #8
So WTF Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #13
DOJ 🤷‍♀️ onecaliberal Jun 2022 #17
IMO, if they result in opening enough peoples' eyes to vote for Dems... dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #11
Ya. If you boil it down ALL that's important .. swaying some voters ! nt Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #16
I think the DOJ is filled with competent lawyers who will prosecute if they can link the act In It to Win It Jun 2022 #12
Yes! GA! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #33
Gotta love how the right wing frames everything. unblock Jun 2022 #14
+100,000 wnylib Jun 2022 #29
Most of the media is owned by the same investors that "own" most of the GOP. PufPuf23 Jun 2022 #34
I am a Dem for generations . In my DNA. Just asking Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #44
Huh?? Ok. So guess from the Democratic pov, it does not Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #35
my point is that the focus should be on the horrible things we're all seeing that republicans did unblock Jun 2022 #47
Think you could be? reading WAY too much into this? Bottom line. Does the right Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #51
Biggest mystery... Why aren't we on tV three times a day Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #58
No mystery. The media is always most interested in pushing right wing frames unblock Jun 2022 #59
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2022 #60
No Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #15
If you can't get the Justice department to act with this overwhelming evidence.... BlueTsunami2018 Jun 2022 #18
If I could agree more than 100% I would ! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #45
Yet good will eventually outweigh bad. At least that's Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #55
+1, the fake Trump electors are low hanging fruit!!!! uponit7771 Jun 2022 #61
Who was the panelist? greatauntoftriplets Jun 2022 #20
What does your family member mean be "due justice?" rsdsharp Jun 2022 #21
Yes! Think they meant " due process". They kept harkening Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #37
I don't expect there to be a major prosecution, but I think these hearings are very Poiuyt Jun 2022 #22
It all depends on who writes the history. If they are not prosecuted there will doc03 Jun 2022 #42
No. The J6 committee and the DoJ have different functions. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #23
Thanks. That was much better than wnylib Jun 2022 #31
Totally clear to us... May not be to THEM Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #39
I agree that the CNN panelist does not understand the constitution and might be a secret MAGA!! NT texasfiddler Jun 2022 #25
+++ JohnSJ Jun 2022 #30
It was a pure political remark Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #41
Laura, the best answer to give, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #38
Agree 100%. Actually just think the fact that there Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #40
Actually, we have to get used to the fact that truth Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #46
Based on the comments here MyMission Jun 2022 #48
Do think it interesting.... Good ploy to try, but then assume Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #54
I'm hopeful it will sway a few votes here and there MyMission Jun 2022 #57
no prosecution - not the committee failed, the *WHOLE GOVERNMENT* UTUSN Jun 2022 #49
Yes.. Hearings of a House select committee just a piece. If a human beingca Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #53
Merrick Garland will have failed. Many thought he would be remembered for being helpisontheway Jun 2022 #50
Exactly! Why was he selected? If I was in charge of something, I would Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #52
How do you know he didn't? BlueTsunami2018 Jun 2022 #62
Wow, that CNN panelist is trying to cause outrage at Emile Jun 2022 #63
Not a failure HAB911 Jun 2022 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just heard CNN panelist s...»Reply #54