Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DeSantis Promises Florida Will Control Disney Content [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(157,920 posts)58. What did Disney actually lose from its Florida battle with DeSantis?
This new law will not affect WDW operations
Link to tweet
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what-did-disney-actually-lose-from-its-florida-battle-with-desantis/ar-AA187kz2?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=5faa3681c21e476c81569612f4f914a5&ei=42
But what did Disney actually lose from its battle with DeSantis?
While the new law delivers some significant changes, the most crucial one is the canceling of a previous mandate that would have resulted in the total dissolution of the district. That earlier law, which DeSantis and state legislators rushed across the finish line in a sprint last spring, would have left taxpayers in Orange and Osceola counties, the two districts Disney straddles, saddled with debt owed by the district.
That was something that a lot of people were worried about, said Jacob Schumer, an attorney specializing in Florida local government and tax laws who has written about the bond-debt issue. Nothing is going to change. The disaster that was gonna hit the county and the taxpayers around here other than Disney its not going to affect them......
But in other ways, its mostly business as usual, at least for now, experts say. Many essential privileges that made Reedy Creek unique remain intact, including the ability to issue bonds. Those are the special things about what Reedy Creek did, Schumer said.
Reedy Creek was born in part from the lessons that brothers Walt and Roy Disney learned from operating Disneyland in Anaheim, which opened in 1955. Their ambitions were curtailed by government red tape, having to work with the city for public services and on zoning issues. As the brothers looked to expand Disneys footprint only 10% of the people who came to Disneyland in California came from east of the Mississippi River they wanted to have their own self-regulating system. The company eventually settled on Florida and worked with lawmakers to establish the Reedy Creek Improvement District in 1967. The theme park opened a few years later in 1971.
The district, spanning about 40 square miles in Orange and Osceola counties, provides everything from fire protection and emergency medical services to water systems, flood control and electric power generation. Its boundaries include four theme parks, two water parks, a sports complex, 175 miles of roadway, the cities of Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista, utility centers, more than 40,000 hotel rooms and hundreds of restaurants and retail stores, according to its website.
While the new law delivers some significant changes, the most crucial one is the canceling of a previous mandate that would have resulted in the total dissolution of the district. That earlier law, which DeSantis and state legislators rushed across the finish line in a sprint last spring, would have left taxpayers in Orange and Osceola counties, the two districts Disney straddles, saddled with debt owed by the district.
That was something that a lot of people were worried about, said Jacob Schumer, an attorney specializing in Florida local government and tax laws who has written about the bond-debt issue. Nothing is going to change. The disaster that was gonna hit the county and the taxpayers around here other than Disney its not going to affect them......
But in other ways, its mostly business as usual, at least for now, experts say. Many essential privileges that made Reedy Creek unique remain intact, including the ability to issue bonds. Those are the special things about what Reedy Creek did, Schumer said.
Reedy Creek was born in part from the lessons that brothers Walt and Roy Disney learned from operating Disneyland in Anaheim, which opened in 1955. Their ambitions were curtailed by government red tape, having to work with the city for public services and on zoning issues. As the brothers looked to expand Disneys footprint only 10% of the people who came to Disneyland in California came from east of the Mississippi River they wanted to have their own self-regulating system. The company eventually settled on Florida and worked with lawmakers to establish the Reedy Creek Improvement District in 1967. The theme park opened a few years later in 1971.
The district, spanning about 40 square miles in Orange and Osceola counties, provides everything from fire protection and emergency medical services to water systems, flood control and electric power generation. Its boundaries include four theme parks, two water parks, a sports complex, 175 miles of roadway, the cities of Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista, utility centers, more than 40,000 hotel rooms and hundreds of restaurants and retail stores, according to its website.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

As a Floridian, was hesitant to urge DUers to boycott my home state. However, power and $$ are the
allegorical oracle
Mar 2023
#67
As long as the appellation "Booty McBootface" is used. "Booty McBootface" will leave a mark on ...
Botany
Mar 2023
#33
The Disney family have very little control from what I read on the internet.....
Lovie777
Mar 2023
#4
Exactly. A governor who'll make himself the cautionary tale of unconstitutional Orbanism.
ancianita
Mar 2023
#46
He would never succeed if he were governor of a cold state with miserable weather
Walleye
Mar 2023
#11
Passing a law that affects all corporations in a state is different from a law only affecting one.
House of Roberts
Mar 2023
#20
This bill will not affect operations of the parks at Walt Disney World or Disney content
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2023
#21
He can try to defend his contract controls, but it boils down to Disney's 1A rights of content.
ancianita
Mar 2023
#49
Weird, remember when GOPers were all about the hand of the free market deciding
Wingus Dingus
Mar 2023
#41
Nothing like telling a multi-national company you can control content because of the toe they have i
haele
Mar 2023
#42
Because DeathSantis apparently now controls the Disney land and controls the Disney World board,
Zilli
Mar 2023
#56
he definitely has lost his mind. his win of the governship by a large % had gone to his head
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Mar 2023
#61