Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Historic news - NYTimes reporting Grand Jury voted to FELONY indict trump! [View all]Roland99
(53,345 posts)5. NYTimes article .....
The unprecedented case against Trump will have wide-ranging implications.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/03/30/nyregion/trump-indictment-news/the-unprecedented-case-against-trump-will-have-wide-ranging-implications
The felony indictment, filed under seal by the Manhattan district attorneys office, will likely be announced in the coming days. By then, prosecutors working for the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, will have asked Mr. Trump to surrender and to face arraignment on charges that remain unknown for now.
Heres what else you need to know:
Mr. Bragg and his lawyers will likely attempt to negotiate Mr. Trumps surrender. If he agrees, it will raise the prospect of a former president, with the Secret Service in tow, being photographed and fingerprinted in the bowels of a New York State courthouse.
The prosecutions star witness is Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trumps former fixer who paid the $130,000 to keep Ms. Daniels quiet. Mr. Cohen has said that Mr. Trump directed him to buy Ms. Danielss silence, and that Mr. Trump and his family business, the Trump Organization, helped cover the whole thing up. The companys internal records falsely identified the reimbursements as legal expenses, which helped conceal the purpose of the payments.
Although the specific charges remain unknown, Mr. Braggs prosecutors have zeroed in on that hush money payment and the false records created by Mr. Trumps company. A conviction is not a sure thing: An attempt to combine a charge relating to the false records with an election violation relating to the payment to Ms. Daniels would be based on a legal theory that has yet to be evaluated by judges, raising the possibility that a court could throw out or limit the charges.
The vote to indict, the product of a nearly five-year investigation, kicks off a new and volatile phase in Mr. Trumps post-presidential life as he makes a third run for the White House. And it could throw the race for the Republican nomination which he leads in most polls into uncharted territory.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Historic news - NYTimes reporting Grand Jury voted to FELONY indict trump! [View all]
Roland99
Mar 2023
OP
Trump can run for president while in jail. No rules against it and no rules against a convicted
LiberalArkie
Mar 2023
#28
He could.. Being a state charge, he could not do anything, maybe.. Uncharted territory
LiberalArkie
Mar 2023
#33
I want everybody to go to their open window and shout, "LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP,... "
spike jones
Mar 2023
#29