General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]Mc Mike
(9,111 posts)lists the powerful families and groups that have owned and run this country, since the second half of the 19th century. All of them didn't have their employees do it, but consensus among them after the fact covered for the ones who did.
I'm pretty sure I'm not out of line in 'throwing stones' at the S.S. and Dallas P.D., in light of their performance of their duties. I don't begrudge you your feeling that the W.C. gave you closure and healed some pain for you, but your belief in it doesn't comfort others who don't believe in it.
I never said or believed Johnson had anything to do with the assassination, that's a red-herring.
History is written by the winners, so if a powerful group killed the president and covered it up, they were above the president in power structure terms, and they were in charge after '63. Therefore, continued speculation about the shadowy group is actually active opposition to the younger inheritors of the power those people gained from the crime, (or exhibited by the crime).
Given the absence of any proof of solicitation of funds from the several active engaged post-ers here who don't buy the official story, I think Occam's Razor applies that they aren't part of a cottage industry engaged in profit-motivated activities.