Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

deminks

(11,134 posts)
Tue Jun 11, 2024, 01:26 PM Jun 11

Three jurors speak to CNN after Hunter Biden trial [View all]

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/hunter-biden-trial-06-11-24/index.html#h_49def32184abfa994afffb9347a238e3

Snip

Three jurors who spoke to CNN after they reached a guilty verdict said that they believed they had no choice but to find Hunter Biden guilty — but said that they question whether the criminal case ever should have been brought against the president’s son.

The case “seemed like a waste of taxpayer dollars,” one female juror told CNN.

Another male juror said that the process was “a little but frustrating because it felt like we couldn’t get the full story.”

End snip

Seems like the appeal will be interesting.

My wish is that the MEdia will move on now, but it seems we are all Hunter all day all week now.

/rant off
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm glad they came forward to comment: Passages Jun 11 #1
(this) criminal case. harumph Jun 11 #25
Drug Test all the ammosexuals. forgotmylogin Jun 11 #29
Notice that they are able to safely come forward Ohioboy Jun 12 #59
Exactly. Your post should have it's own thread. Swede Jun 12 #60
That really does stand out, they did not hesitate to speak. Passages Jun 12 #61
One man said the defense putting the MOMFUDSKI Jun 11 #2
Unless the feds start prosecuting every weed smoker who buys a gun, maxsolomon Jun 11 #3
He was not just a casual marijuana user, Tickle Jun 11 #26
OK, fentanyl users, then. maxsolomon Jun 11 #28
+100! ShazzieB Jun 11 #30
Yep. calimary Jun 11 #33
Unless you've got a medical marijuana card, use of marijuana is disqualifying. Nevilledog Jun 11 #38
I did not know this Tickle Jun 11 #39
Exactly Nevilledog Jun 11 #41
That's my friggin' point! maxsolomon Jun 11 #52
CNN wishes that Hunter would hurry up and committ 31 more felonies so they could both sides this story better vs Trumpy. FSogol Jun 11 #4
Yawn... brooklynite Jun 11 #6
CNN ruins a perfectly good conspiracy theory..... brooklynite Jun 12 #58
I notice that none of them seem to fear any sort of retaliation thucythucy Jun 11 #5
You said a mouthful!!! MOMFUDSKI Jun 11 #23
Exactly my first thought mjvpi Jun 11 #32
When I first read the headline Farmer-Rick Jun 11 #35
Nailed it malaise Jun 11 #36
Aren't they worried to show their faces? That mad libs will go after them & their families? CrispyQ Jun 11 #7
Yep, first thing I thought too 0rganism Jun 11 #9
And the presidents statement didn't blame or accuse anyone of a witch hunt or of a weaponized DOJ. CrispyQ Jun 11 #10
Democrats are high-quality people. Republicans are low-quality people Traurigkeit Jun 11 #24
No basis for an appeal... brooklynite Jun 11 #8
His appeal is based upon the Special Counsel ScratchCat Jun 11 #14
Doesn't matter... brooklynite Jun 11 #21
The law is all but certainly unconstitutional under the current SCOTUS interpretation dsc Jun 11 #20
I think that's completely correct. He was clearly (too my eyes) selectively prosecuted for circumstances ToxMarz Jun 11 #40
HA! This whole thing stinks... druidity33 Jun 11 #43
I'll say it doesn't matter because, legally it doesn't... brooklynite Jun 11 #46
That honestly surprises me... druidity33 Jun 11 #54
Perhaps its the fact that -I- haven't been all over the Hunter Biden case? brooklynite Jun 11 #55
Well that's kinda the point... druidity33 Jun 11 #57
I agree with you about Marci Wheeler. I've been following her since Bush* was in office. dmr Jun 12 #63
I think there is an interesting issue on appeal. TomSlick Jun 11 #45
Turn it off. onecaliberal Jun 11 #11
I've said this since the case was brought D_Master81 Jun 11 #12
They tried. But hunters lawyers tried to add future trials jimfields33 Jun 11 #13
I hope the media continues to focus on Hunter Biden's case because the contrast with Trump Martin68 Jun 11 #15
I can't help but think that, though this is all bad for the Biden family.... LAS14 Jun 11 #16
They felt free to speak because Joe Biden wasn't threatening them. SunSeeker Jun 11 #17
A lawyer on Bloomberg TV videohead5 Jun 11 #18
Two good things about Hunter's guilty verdict: sop Jun 11 #19
I hate this about juries IbogaProject Jun 11 #22
A juror can do many things. A JURY is a much more difficult thing. brooklynite Jun 11 #48
At least one juror thought the case was in error IbogaProject Jun 11 #51
Wait a 2nd, "the trial should have never been brought", and "we did not get the full story"... Escurumbele Jun 11 #27
Sounds a lot like "reasonable doubt" to me nuxvomica Jun 11 #31
"Blame the jury".....that'll play well. brooklynite Jun 11 #47
That's what Jury nullification is for moonshinegnomie Jun 11 #34
Judy objects to being wiped out! marybourg Jun 11 #37
That's not how it works. Misery Business Jun 11 #56
Wrong. That's exactly how it works. kcr Jun 12 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 12 #64
A good juror kcr Jun 12 #65
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 12 #66
Will these jurors get death threats now for finding Hunter guilty but feel remorse? kimbutgar Jun 11 #42
This should be the blueprint to go after the assorted lunatics who are in possession of firearms illegally wolfie001 Jun 11 #44
TY & Jurors! Cha Jun 11 #49
On MSNBC, Maya Wiley Deminpenn Jun 11 #50
Hope we move on quickly from this. I found the sordid details disturbing, but Hunter isn't Silent Type Jun 11 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Three jurors speak to CNN...