General Discussion

electric_blue68

(16,722 posts)

21. "WE "just" need to reframe the idea...". "Just!?" We're NOT your broodmares, effer!

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Wed Jul 17, 2024, 04:45 PM

Jul 17

Effin' trogolytes!

Such a infuriating attitude, drives me nutz.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JD Vance Said We Just Need To Reframe The Idea Of Forcing Women To Stay Pregnant [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 17 OP

He forgot to add, the important thing is that the women suffer punishment Walleye Jul 17 #1

Repackage the same 💩 but it says the same thing. Deuxcents Jul 17 #2

A new frame. Turbineguy Jul 17 #3

Let's see them try to reframe a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy Wicked Blue Jul 17 #4

Will all fathers be equally responsible for the child from pregnancy to adulthood? bullimiami Jul 17 #5

Then you fucking have the baby, you GD monster. Let's force you to endur something equally traumatic. hlthe2b Jul 17 #6

The word you are looking for is elastrator. localroger Jul 17 #9

It is called an emasculator--used on bulls and boars. I was just being sensitive to some here. hlthe2b Jul 17 #19

Elastrator is yet another device that does the same job localroger Jul 17 #37

Yes, but used on smaller (usually younger) animals. Considered cruel by many because of the high chance of hlthe2b Jul 17 #38

Filling them with the fruit of our nation? Frasier Balzov Jul 17 #7

The baby farms on Battlestar Galactica were all about the babies, too. tanyev Jul 17 #8

Let's play at reframing.....do non-citizens have Maeve Jul 17 #10

It's a potential male, so yes, it would have more rights than the "weaker vessel," women. n/t valleyrogue Jul 17 #12

Project 2025 wants to amend the Constitution whathehell Jul 17 #29

Also, forced birth violates a woman's 13th Amendment rights. CrispyQ Jul 18 #59

I have been saying this for decades now Tumbulu Jul 18 #61

Well done! soldierant Jul 18 #65

According to this MRA neckbeard, valleyrogue Jul 17 #11

THIS. In MAGA mentality, women serve the needs of men. B.See Jul 17 #31

Hey ladies! JD Vance wants to do the thinkin' for ya.... Blue Owl Jul 17 #13

No one is required by law to give up their bodily autonomy for another person ProfessorPlum Jul 17 #14

Very good argument cpamomfromtexas Jul 17 #17

There is the "Sister's Keeper" argument localroger Jul 17 #39

Well said, and well thought nuxvomica Jul 18 #63

exactly - well put ProfessorPlum Jul 18 #64

Women are forced to give up their autonomy for this. CrispyQ Jul 18 #66

Proceed, Senator. Baitball Blogger Jul 17 #15

So how about picking up the tab and PAYING HER cpamomfromtexas Jul 17 #16

Not only is THAT not even a consideration, bluesbassman Jul 17 #22

In the large majority of abortions there is no baby. SamKnause Jul 17 #18

Does this work both ways? LetMyPeopleVote Jul 17 #20

"WE "just" need to reframe the idea...". "Just!?" We're NOT your broodmares, effer! electric_blue68 Jul 17 #21

Would he still feel that way if his wife or one day his daughter Blaukraut Jul 17 #23

He'll still SAY the same throwback sht, but THEY never do B.See Jul 17 #34

Sorry, JD, there ain't enough lipstick for that pig. n/t Xavier Breath Jul 17 #24

It isn't a baby until it is BORN........! DemocraticPatriot Jul 17 #25

Fuck that shit! GPV Jul 17 #26

"And we need to reframe slavery to be about the rights of the business owner! unblock Jul 17 #27

Well, you must have read Project 2025. haele Jul 18 #58

It's apparently what a large portion of Merica' wants. NoMoreRepugs Jul 17 #28

So Vance is willing to pay for the woman's healthcare? Ritabert Jul 17 #30

Spraying rose water on shit gets you nothing but rose water on shit. The shit is still shit. Solly Mack Jul 17 #32

someone who calls rape resulting in pregnancy "somehow inconvenient" DBoon Jul 17 #33

That's right! Freedom Hatching is much better! Bristlecone Jul 17 #35

Fuck you, JD, you misogynist piece of shit. You don't have a clue what you're talking about. Diamond_Dog Jul 17 #36

It's not inconvenient to "SOCIETY" -- in GOP-land, we are each ON OUR OWN, mom gets all the medical bills lostnfound Jul 17 #40

Yep, that's the babies are innocent meme. But babies CAN and DO create HUGE problems Model35mech Jul 17 #41

Let's reframe it to include the death penalty for rapists. And mandatory vasectomies for all males at 18. flying_wahini Jul 18 #42

The vasectomies should be earlier than 18 but otherwise seems rurallib Jul 18 #55

How Gilead of him. Silver Gaia Jul 18 #43

Is it time for a "Bernard Shaw" question karynnj Jul 18 #44

"It's not that our sadistic policies suck - it's our MESSAGING that's the problem!!!" hatrack Jul 18 #45

Hey Asshole:How about making birth control very widely available, how about paying for all child care costs, how about.. Dorn Jul 18 #46

it's not markie Jul 18 #47

"inconvenient"? What a stupid fuck. StarryNite Jul 18 #48

"somewhat inconvenient" CTyankee Jul 18 #49

Hey, yahoo, it is convicted felon FORMER president. niyad Jul 18 #50

Twice impeached. Klarkashton Jul 18 #51

He has some choice quotes for ads SamuelTheThird Jul 18 #52

Time to repost Monty Python's classic: barbaraann Jul 18 #53

Was he the one that said, "The revolution will be bloodless if liberals would just let it happen"? Beartracks Jul 18 #54

A new frame around a turd is still a shitty picture... Wounded Bear Jul 18 #56

If it was about the babies... CrispyQ Jul 18 #57

What a piece of shit! Initech Jul 18 #60

The modern republican party Colorado Liberal Jul 18 #62

Why JD Vance's record on abortion rights matters in 2024 race LetMyPeopleVote Jul 18 #67

"Reframe The Idea" TicketyBoo Jul 19 #68

So I expect the press to ask every GOP what they plan to do to help the babies Old Crank Jul 19 #69

Just like you need to reframe canetoad Jul 19 #70