Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mvd

(65,382 posts)

9. No to FOX

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sun Aug 4, 2024, 03:35 PM

Aug 4

It would be just like Hannity and Colmes used to be. Stacked against her.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Agree to both, with ABC debate first to prevent Trump from pulling a fast one" [View all] Miles Archer Aug 4 OP

No, make him stick to the schedule HE agreed to. There has been no change in his campaign. The Vice President is ready onecaliberal Aug 4 #1

I agree with you 100% in principle. Miles Archer Aug 4 #5

So what. Let America see the Vice President. It would be a great opportunity for her to respond to questions without onecaliberal Aug 4 #8

Abssolutely no debate on Fox. That's ridiculous. servermsh Aug 4 #2

It will be CNN Town Hall II. Miles Archer Aug 4 #7

If there is to be an audience at either... there have to be controls over it. hlthe2b Aug 4 #3

The Harris Campaign CANNOT AGREE TO a "CNN Town Hall" hand-picked MAGAt audience. Miles Archer Aug 4 #10

Give him nothing! returnee Aug 4 #4

Right.. agingdem Aug 4 #29

Nope absolutely not, she has no reason to give him anything. I do believe that suggestion Bev54 Aug 4 #6

There are a number of ways of looking at it... Miles Archer Aug 4 #14

We all know there will only be one debate, if there is any, because she will destroy him, but the point Bev54 Aug 4 #16

I fully agree with the "she owes him nothing" concept Miles Archer Aug 4 #20

No to FOX mvd Aug 4 #9

OUCH Miles Archer Aug 4 #15

No. n/t demmiblue Aug 4 #11

Nope mzmolly Aug 4 #12

WHY don't democrats get it? We need to start broadcasting that Fox IS NOT NEWS, and has no business BComplex Aug 4 #13

I'm with you on this, and I'll ask the question I asked upstream in this thread... Miles Archer Aug 4 #18

Fuck to the NO Gaytano70 Aug 4 #17

So, let him cancel the ABC debate. GoCubsGo Aug 4 #19

No. There is no reason for Kamala to even respond to his Fox News bullshit. GoodRaisin Aug 4 #21

Looking at all of the possibilities... Miles Archer Aug 4 #25

Just my opinion, but she doesn't NEED to debate him at all. GoodRaisin Aug 4 #28

Makes perfect sense. Miles Archer Aug 4 #36

A Republican is telling the Harris Campaign what they should do? Botany Aug 4 #22

Nope. Stick with the ABC event Retrograde Aug 4 #23

No, he doesn't get to negotiate one and just dictate the terms of another TheKentuckian Aug 4 #24

And yes, it WAS presented as a DEMAND, not a negotiation Miles Archer Aug 4 #26

That's dumb. If she agrees to the Fox one, the MAGA morons will take it as a win. Scrivener7 Aug 4 #27

I was watching that segment Sugarcoated Aug 4 #30

No. Never again. Hekate Aug 4 #31

He gets nothing! He loses! Why people insist on bending over backwards for a colicky toddler is Carlitos Brigante Aug 4 #32

Yes to ABC then Fox PROVIDED onandup Aug 4 #33

Absolutely not. Hugin Aug 4 #34

No, no, no. First, regardless of network, audiences should be a non starter. F that. themaguffin Aug 4 #35

That's the dealbreaker for me... Miles Archer Aug 4 #37

No, that would be stupid. He agreed to the debate that he's chickened out of. Autumn Aug 4 #38