Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

GoodRaisin

(9,483 posts)

21. No. There is no reason for Kamala to even respond to his Fox News bullshit.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sun Aug 4, 2024, 03:47 PM

Aug 4

She is way too smart for that. She has him on his heels now. The polling is turning against him and she has at least 2 more bumps coming, first from her VP pick; and second from the convention. All she has to do now is stay her course while he continues to implode. By September 10th he’ll be begging ABC and Kamala to let him back in.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Agree to both, with ABC debate first to prevent Trump from pulling a fast one" [View all] Miles Archer Aug 4 OP

No, make him stick to the schedule HE agreed to. There has been no change in his campaign. The Vice President is ready onecaliberal Aug 4 #1

I agree with you 100% in principle. Miles Archer Aug 4 #5

So what. Let America see the Vice President. It would be a great opportunity for her to respond to questions without onecaliberal Aug 4 #8

Abssolutely no debate on Fox. That's ridiculous. servermsh Aug 4 #2

It will be CNN Town Hall II. Miles Archer Aug 4 #7

If there is to be an audience at either... there have to be controls over it. hlthe2b Aug 4 #3

The Harris Campaign CANNOT AGREE TO a "CNN Town Hall" hand-picked MAGAt audience. Miles Archer Aug 4 #10

Give him nothing! returnee Aug 4 #4

Right.. agingdem Aug 4 #29

Nope absolutely not, she has no reason to give him anything. I do believe that suggestion Bev54 Aug 4 #6

There are a number of ways of looking at it... Miles Archer Aug 4 #14

We all know there will only be one debate, if there is any, because she will destroy him, but the point Bev54 Aug 4 #16

I fully agree with the "she owes him nothing" concept Miles Archer Aug 4 #20

No to FOX mvd Aug 4 #9

OUCH Miles Archer Aug 4 #15

No. n/t demmiblue Aug 4 #11

Nope mzmolly Aug 4 #12

WHY don't democrats get it? We need to start broadcasting that Fox IS NOT NEWS, and has no business BComplex Aug 4 #13

I'm with you on this, and I'll ask the question I asked upstream in this thread... Miles Archer Aug 4 #18

Fuck to the NO Gaytano70 Aug 4 #17

So, let him cancel the ABC debate. GoCubsGo Aug 4 #19

No. There is no reason for Kamala to even respond to his Fox News bullshit. GoodRaisin Aug 4 #21

Looking at all of the possibilities... Miles Archer Aug 4 #25

Just my opinion, but she doesn't NEED to debate him at all. GoodRaisin Aug 4 #28

Makes perfect sense. Miles Archer Aug 4 #36

A Republican is telling the Harris Campaign what they should do? Botany Aug 4 #22

Nope. Stick with the ABC event Retrograde Aug 4 #23

No, he doesn't get to negotiate one and just dictate the terms of another TheKentuckian Aug 4 #24

And yes, it WAS presented as a DEMAND, not a negotiation Miles Archer Aug 4 #26

That's dumb. If she agrees to the Fox one, the MAGA morons will take it as a win. Scrivener7 Aug 4 #27

I was watching that segment Sugarcoated Aug 4 #30

No. Never again. Hekate Aug 4 #31

He gets nothing! He loses! Why people insist on bending over backwards for a colicky toddler is Carlitos Brigante Aug 4 #32

Yes to ABC then Fox PROVIDED onandup Aug 4 #33

Absolutely not. Hugin Aug 4 #34

No, no, no. First, regardless of network, audiences should be a non starter. F that. themaguffin Aug 4 #35

That's the dealbreaker for me... Miles Archer Aug 4 #37

No, that would be stupid. He agreed to the debate that he's chickened out of. Autumn Aug 4 #38