HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Regarding the USA’s “War ... » Reply #4

Response to Mr.Bill (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:10 PM

4. Actually to his credit, Obama is making some substantial adjustments in the public rhetoric

 

This is huge actually. I may revise OP with it; or better yet, create a new OP
with it, as I just discovered it. .. next he'll be aquitting Bradley Manning and
ditching his drone program. I'm staying tuned.


For the First Time, Obama Official Sketches Out End to War on Terror
BY SPENCER ACKERMAN11.30.1212:00 P

"Neither the George W. Bush nor Barack Obama White House ever laid out a vision for what an end to the war on terrorism would actually look like. But as Obama prepares for his second term in office, one of his top defense officials is arguing that there is an end in sight, and laying out conditions for when the U.S. will reach it.

“On the present course, there will come a tipping point,” Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon’s top lawyer, told the Oxford Union in the U.K. on Friday, “a tipping point at which so many of the leaders and operatives of al-Qaida and its affiliates have been killed or captured, and the group is no longer able to attempt or launch a strategic attack against the United States, such that al-Qaida as we know it, the organization that our Congress authorized the military to pursue in 2001, has been effectively destroyed.” At that point, “our efforts should no longer be considered an armed conflict.”

Johnson’s description of the endgame raises more questions than answers. But under his formulation, the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), which the Obama administration has cited as the foundation of its wartime powers, would expire. That would mean any detainee at Guantanamo Bay who hasn’t been charged with a crime would be free to go, although Johnson says that wouldn’t necessarily happen immediately. It would also raise questions about whether the U.S. would possess residual legal authorities for its lethal drone program — which Johnson defended to the BBC on Thursday — including the legal basis for any “postwar” drone strike the CIA might perform.

In Johnson’s view, once al-Qaida’s ability to launch a strategic attack is gone, so too is the war. What will remain is a “counterterrorism effort” against the “individuals who are the scattered remnants” of the organization or even unaffiliated terrorists. “The law enforcement and intelligence resources of our government are principally responsible” for dealing with them, Johnson said, according to the text of his speech, with “military assets in reserve” for an imminent threat.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/11/jeh-johnson-terrorism/

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
99th_Monkey Dec 2012 OP
Scabby57 Dec 2012 #1
Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #2
dchill Dec 2012 #3
LineLineNew Reply Actually to his credit, Obama is making some substantial adjustments in the public rhetoric
99th_Monkey Dec 2012 #4
Please login to view edit histories.