Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is a post on the Greatest page, spreading harmful misinformation , with 53 recs. [View all]Jack Valentino
(1,029 posts)55. I didn't much care about it either way.
If one DU poster makes a mistake, versus the seven seas of right-wing disinformation, I don't really give a fuck.
I had moved on the first time I saw it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a post on the Greatest page, spreading harmful misinformation , with 53 recs. [View all]
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2
OP
And Weissman's wrong about that. He was careless and spread misinformation there.
highplainsdem
Oct 2
#10
I re-watched and found it this time. And Weissman is 100 percent wrong. Page 8, which he cites could not be more clear
onenote
Oct 2
#21
I think he got it wrong because he did a rush reading/interpretation of the 160-something page filing.
iluvtennis
Oct 3
#86
I'm so glad you posted this. I knew I wasn't losing my mind and I'd heard that on Nicole's show
Native
Oct 3
#73
another poster who can't make a point of disagreement without accusing the other person of being a 'trumper'
bigtree
Oct 3
#99
you called me that. You called me a 'trumper.' No one who actually knows me has the temerity to insult me so
bigtree
Oct 3
#101
Agree. We don't need to disseminate misinformation to win this thing. But don't think it will stop anyone.
Silent Type
Oct 2
#4
Totally agree. On the other hand, wouldn't want someone to say they got bad info here.
Silent Type
Oct 2
#54
He read it within minutes of it dropping so let's cut him some slack, he got it wrong.
Bev54
Oct 3
#77
That post was specifically referring another thread posted by the person I was replying to
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2
#31
Seriously, Weisman quoted it wrong, within minutes of it dropping and him trying to pull
Bev54
Oct 3
#78
At first, yes, then after about 12 hours of outcry on this thread and the OP, it was edited. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 3
#94
I just visited one of those threads and spent 10 minutes trying to source that quote. It should be removed.
Runningdawg
Oct 2
#29
Yeah, I take your word for that-- I read the story elsewhere and noticed it was not totally clear
Jack Valentino
Oct 2
#51