Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

maxsolomon

(36,050 posts)

2. Congress should pass a constitutional amendment banning it.

Reply to Clouds Passing (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 3, 2025, 04:42 PM

Jan 3

Or maybe just prohibiting its manufacture and consumption. Does "Prohibition" sound like a catchy name?

Why settle for half measures like warning labels?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dickthegrouch

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Surgeon General calls for cancer warning on alcohol [View all] Tanuki Jan 3 OP

Alcohol is a scourge all across society in general. Clouds Passing Jan 3 #1

Congress should pass a constitutional amendment banning it. maxsolomon Jan 3 #2

Prohibition resulted in more deaths than not having Prohibition would have alarimer Jan 3 #3

Defensiveness is not a good sign. Clouds Passing Jan 3 #6

I know that. I'm not for a for a ban. They don't work. Clouds Passing Jan 3 #4

I think the younger generations drink less alcohol JI7 Jan 3 #5

Only when used to excess dickthegrouch Jan 3 #8

Can we put warning labels on dangerous cabinet members? dickthegrouch Jan 3 #7