Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I just noticed that amongst all the 'blame the parents' and 'arm the teacher' threads [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)12. I am
Specifically, I am blaming the owner of the firearms for failing to keep them properly secured.
It so happens that the person in question was a parent. The author of the OP mistakes this as "blaming the parents" qua "parents". But I wouldn't change my mind if the owner of the firearms had been a neighbor, and the kid had broken into the neighbor's house and taken them.
ANYONE who owns firearms has a responsibility to ensure that they do not fall into the wrong hands. If someone owns a tiger, they need to make sure that tiger doesn't get out of its enclosure.
There are going to be suits against the mother's estate, and they are likely to succeed, as it is readily apparent that she failed to secure her firearms.
But some people are going to call that "blame the parents" instead of "blame the gun owner".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I just noticed that amongst all the 'blame the parents' and 'arm the teacher' threads [View all]
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
OP
Pursuant to this, I am reviewing all the mutual funds in my IRA this week to make
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#8
I'm not entirely disagreeing with you but, in this case, with the owner of the firearms
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#16
Wow, I know enough to know when I am in the presence of an expert and
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#25
Thank you for that annotation. I believe I worded my post to which you
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#85
Owning a tiger is highly regulated, highly restricted, and highly monitored.
IllinoisBirdWatcher
Dec 2012
#30
That was a very good post, thanks. People who own guns should thus secure them & be INSURED in the
KittyWampus
Dec 2012
#48
I put a weapon like the one used in Sandy Creek at PRECISELY the same level as NBC weapons
RomneyLies
Dec 2012
#7
Look, I think everyone on this forum who read my use of 'WMD' understood
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#73
The gun industry has never claimed their product doesn't kill people...
Jeff In Milwaukee
Dec 2012
#24
Agreed. But his mother was a Glenn Beck type, who stockpiled ammo and guns.
progressivebydesign
Dec 2012
#27
Typical deflection tactics. They want people to waste time arguing about parents/drugs/teachers
jsr
Dec 2012
#42
I blame the gun manufacturers for marketing their products to potentially violent,
Moses2SandyKoufax
Dec 2012
#63
People tried suing the gun manufacturers but the Supreme Court ruled it out.
jerseyjack
Dec 2012
#64
I actually was not talking about you specifically or even generally. At least I don't
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2012
#72
I have a measure of difficulty with that statement. What about children who are taught racism.
olegramps
Dec 2012
#82
When you make people killers and they do their job and kill people, is it the makers or the users or
The Wielding Truth
Dec 2012
#77