Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)

5. If you need Social Security to live on you are

Reply to jberryhill (Original post)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:48 PM

Dec 2012

the volnerable. So what's going to happen? People who need Social Security get cuts and people who REALLY need Social Security will be protected?
What's the difference?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"he would make sure that the most vulnerable were exempted out from this change" [View all] jberryhill Dec 2012 OP

More means testing paperwork hell. Amak8 Dec 2012 #1

Probably means, the vulnerable get 105% of whatever closeupready Dec 2012 #2

Yeah ... right. GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #3

Exactly the scam I predicted: woo me with science Dec 2012 #4

If you need Social Security to live on you are upaloopa Dec 2012 #5

Are those the only two classes of recipients? jberryhill Dec 2012 #10

The correct term is 'beneficaries'. The two words do not mean the same things. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #17

Not comforting. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2012 #6

DU rec...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #7

Yeah, let's implement a right-wing scam. It's just fine as long as we exempt a few people. woo me with science Dec 2012 #8

And? What does that mean, exactly? Other than the clear fact that it is an admission Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #9

Those are b.s. words from the WH Larkspur Dec 2012 #11

Thank you. Note how the expectations of our party are constantly shifted woo me with science Dec 2012 #14

+1 leftstreet Dec 2012 #16

Okay, so you pick and choose which ones are "BS" jberryhill Dec 2012 #18

You are the one making the assertion that this phrase mitigates cutting Social Security. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #23

+1 HiPointDem Dec 2012 #22

really? I'd love to know how he could possibly do that. It's lying dog shit. cali Dec 2012 #12

a la "the most vulnerable can go to the ER for all healthcare needs" jsr Dec 2012 #13

OP seems to have left the building with an attache case filled with terms of art. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #15

That's nothing more than a throwaway line. Anyone who is paying attention Autumn Dec 2012 #19

"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". nt jody Dec 2012 #20

Nothing is good enough for the reactionary left and right. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #21